 |
|||
|
|
democracy blog wakey, wakey... ustaj vojsko |
||
 |
"Nous avons
vu aujourd'hui des
choses merveilleuses."
16 May 2008 As we know, Mr Tony Blair has converted into a Catholic. Par contre, on Croatian end, quite a few thought-to-be-decent Catholics converted into Sanader's HDZ. Of course, Democracy blog had to recoil a bit after all, and following the latest comment on this page. There needs to be a new blog entitled: "Nous avons vu aujourd'hui des choses merveilleuses." The link shall be posted shortly. Surf safely, IA [As announced, as of 18 May 2008, "Democracy blog" transfers to all "Things Marvelous" here] |
Danas smo vidjeli svakih
čuda 16. svibnja 2008. Kao što znamo, gosp. Tony Blair se obratio prešavši na Katoličku vjeru. A contrario, na hrvatskoj strani, neki Katolici koji su se činili dostojni preobratili su se na Sanaderov HDZ. Naravno, Blog o demokraciji je morao malo uzmaknuti nakon svega, te posljednjeg komentara na ovim stranicama. Treba otvoriti novi blog s nazivom "Danas smo vidjeli svakih čuda." Uskoro spojnica. Surf safely, IA [Kako najavljeno, tako od 18. svibnja, "Blog o demokraciji" prelazi u blog "Krasnih li čuda" ovdje] |
|
|
REMINDER: "Tony
Blair" and "Croatian Politics" SDP: Democracy spinning on the cat's tail in Croatia (10 Jan 2007) HDZ:Sanader about his idol Tony Blair (10 May 2007) Now, Christopher Cviic from London suggests that Sanader and HDZ run Croatia There we can also find Balkan's "Moving on" with the seat in Belgrade, Serbia, which is most probably behind HDZ's slogan of today. That's "democracy" Croatians got on the recent "elections." |
PODSJETNIK: "Tony
Blair" i "hrvatska politika"
SDP: Objesili demokraciju mačku o rep u Hrvatskoj (10. 05.2007.) Sanader o svom idolu Tonyju Blairu (10.05.2007.) Sada Christopher Cviic iz Londona predlaže da Sanader i HDZ vode Hrvatsku Na njegovim stranicama ćete naći i balkanski "Idemo dalje" (Moving on), sa sjedištem u Beogradu, Srbija, što je najvjerojatnije pozadina HDZ-ova današnjeg slogana. To je "demokracija" koju su Hrvati dobili na nedavnim "izborima." |
||
|
HDZ USA: I will take a snap with Bush again Croatian weekly Hrvatski list of 6 Dec 2007 published the article: WHO IS FRANK BILAVER, HDZ activist who forged the photo showing him in hugging with Bush? BILAVER – THE DESERTER AND FAILED SEMINARIST
Bilaver is not only the man no 1 in North America’s HDZ, but he’s also the person of Sanader’s confidence. At least, he vaunts of their friendship. However, over the past few years, he’s quite despised by our Diaspora because of his self-love and an unconditional apology for Sanader’s politics. It’s known that he physically threatened those Croatians who attempted to organize the rallies against the capture of General Gotovina several years ago.
Who is Frank Bilaver?
His real name is Frane Bilaver. He was born in Skabrnja. He attended the seminary in Zadar, but he didn’t complete it. The Archbishop of Zadar, Mgr Prendja chased him away when he discovered that he [Bilaver] lied against certain priests. He leaves Skabrnja, Zadar and Croatia uneducated, and goes to +. He didn’t participate for a single day in defense of Skabrnja and Croatia, so in his natal village he’s seen as – a deserter.
At the beginning, the expatriates were collecting the financial aid for his living, while, today, no one knows what he’s doing. According to the unofficial rumor, he lavishly cashed his good connections with Sanader; among other things, he owns shares in Croatian well-to-do companies, he’s constructing his house in Skabrnja by employing illegal foreign workers. They were arrested by Zadar’s police, and then liberated and returned to the construction site following Bilaver’s intervention. Actually, Bilaver – thanks to his close relations with Sanader – acts as the personnel manager within some state services in the area of Zadar.
Bilaver’s reaction on HL article: “I will take a snap with Bush again, regardless of Globus, Nacional or any other weekly to whom I thank for advertising.” (Amac-rb, 6 Dec 2007)
|
HDZ USA: S Bushom ću se opet slikati Tjednik Hrvatski list od 6. 12. 2007. objavio je članak:
TKO
JE FRANK BILAVER, HDZ-ovac
koji
je
montirao
sliku
na
kojoj
je
zagrljen
s
Bušom?
Frank Bilaver,
potpredsjednik
Koordinacije
HDZ-a
za
Sjevernu
Ameriku
i
član
Središnjeg
odbora
i
Nacionalnog
vijeća
HDZ-a,
nedavno
je
prema
pisanju
tjednika
Globus
na
službenim
stranicama
HDZ-a
Amerike
uvrstio
i
fotografiju
na
kojoj
je
zagrljen
s
Bušem.
Bilaverova reakcija na članak iz HL: “S Bushom ću se opet slikati bez obzira na Globus, Nacional ili bilo koji drugi tjednik kojem zahvaljujem na reklami” (Amac-rb, 6.12.2007.) |
||
|
HDZ is not Croatian religion, Sanader is not Croatian God IA 5 Dec 2007 HDZ’s and Sanader’s post-electoral trouble to get the power have become “the moments of agony” for the “Croatian society” according to the comment by Ivan Miklenic in Glas Koncila (Voice of Council, No 49, on 6 Dec, with publishing date of 9 Dec 2007).
However, the opposition of Croatian society to Sanader’s betrayals of Croatia’s best Homeland war soldiers, and of the military operation Storm in particular, since he came to power in 2002-2003, also with the Church activists’ support in Croatia and abroad, has never been a subject of agony for HDZ and Sanader.
Miklenic, in his campaign for recognizing Sanader’s electoral victory, who still doesn’t have the mandate to form the government, mentions “more than 15,000 dead in greater Serbia’s aggression war on Croatia, tens of thousands wounded and permanently traumatized, the war devastations from which suffered Croatia’s heritage and economy, as well as independence of Croatia and its liberation from communist totalitarianism,” but he fails to mention that Sanader and HDZ betrayed all that, especially the military commanders who stopped those tragedies and liberated Croatia.
Hence, Sanader’s got yet another bianco cheque for power, in spite of all his betrayals. Same as Sanader asked the recognition of his victory before he got the majority of the seats for forming the government, in the name of democratic principles (Jutarnji List, 26 Nov 2007), now, Miklenic, in nearly identical wording, is campaigning for “democratic order” so that Sanader be “congratulated” for his electoral victory.
First, let’s congratulate to Sanader for his treason of more than 150,000 demonstrators at Split’s rally, with whom he protested against persecution of General Norac in 2001, only to get to power, and then publicly distance from him. He’s being tried even today. Then, let’s congratulate him for betrayal of general Gotovina. While Croatia is being accused as the state founded on crimes, for its defense, Miklenic sees a “non-civilized attitude” only in a prolongation of the process of Sanader’s placement in position of power.
It’s time to reveal that certain Church activists have chosen the “lesser evil” – HDZ with Sanader at its head – even before elections, and not for the first time.
To be sure, I have nothing against Catholic Church’s influence in political life of Croatia. Generally compared to other religions’ direct involvement in politics, Catholic Church’s role is quite small. It falls in moral sphere.
And this is precisely where some Croatian Church activists failed. Actually, Glas Koncila invited general Gotovina to surrender to The Hague, and thus sacrifice himself for Croatia, once more. Croatia received the financial aid from Europe and the world for that treason. However, it’s in such a debt that it will be a burden for future generations, which wasn’t the case even in the war time.
Hence, where are justice and common good in all that? Similar Church activists will say today, even in Diaspora, that general Gotovina won’t be liberated even if entire Croatia upraises for him now. Does it mean, why bother!? Let it go!? Thus, Sanader’s and Bishop’s warranty for general Gotovina so that he awaits trial in home custody recalls Pilate washing his hands.
Only Sanader is granted forgiveness, only his power is subject of agony for Croatian society.
It’s true that in the current state of affairs in Croatia, some other option might be even worse. President Mesic is assembling the future Croatian government, while HDZ prevailed due to the votes from Diaspora. But Mesic, too, is the “product” of HDZ. Besides, Sanader regularly praises his good relations with Mesic.
The Church officials used to state proudly that no Croatian organization would succeed in Diaspora without Church's support, and no one had objection to it. Croatia is a Catholic country, and the support, at least moral one, from Croatian Catholic missions is both necessary and desirable.
But, today, when we can only choose between treasonous HDZ and the left, which is all – just the left and the treason of Croatia, the question of responsibility for such situation is in order.
All those who opposed HDZ and its treasons were systematically sabotaged and isolated from Croatian social life either in Croatia or in the world, as per HDZ's order. Even the voices of the opposition among the right that still can be heard in Croatia's public life interact with open supporters for HDZ. Whether the Church officials have intermediated in these matters of fact, too, is the question for purgatory of all those who ask it to themselves.
Finally, if the «lesser evil» is acceptable for ordinary people who are clearly advised that they could do nothing about it, how this is possible for those who present a symbol of good, of knowledge and wisdom, and our moral leaders?
Expecting some good from HDZ has become hopeless.
Let Miklenic et al. educate better politicians than Sanader and HDZ, and then offer them to Croatians in the name of the “common good,” for which the Church already had 15 years since Croatia's independence. We can pray for that, as well as for them, but no more for their favorite politicians of today.
Sanader confused all Croatian values. Everyone who dealt with him got compromised, in various ways. Whoever sent the warning about his treasons ended up in HDZ’s purgatory. Apart from those who keep silence, who omit to say the truth, and support all his treasons – they have nothing to complain about. Everything can be bought and sold nowadays.
In other words, Sanader and HDZ missed the opportunity to condemn communism, they betrayed all Croatian patriots, and the Homeland, which is on the trial bench in The Hague. Or, in HDZ’s vocabulary, so often used against their opponents, Sanader’s is a “fired cartridge.” Why some Church activists still count on him, only God knows.
It's time for the real truth. HDZ is not Croatian religion. Sanader is not our God, for disobedience to whom, we were paying dearly, nevertheless. We don't have to bow before the golden calves and HDZ. HDZ and SDP are the same, but HDZ “produced” Mesic and that's Croatian agony.
|
HDZ nije hrvatska vjera, Sanader nije hrvatski Bog
IA
5. prosinca 2007
HDZ-ove i Sanaderove postizborne brige za osvajanje vlasti postale su «časovi zabrinutosti» za «hrvatsko društvo», sudeći po komentaru Ivana Miklenića iz Glasa Koncila od 6. prosinca (Br. 49, s datumom izlaska na 9.12.2007).
A protivljenje tog istog hrvatskog društva svim Sanaderovim izdajama najboljih hrvatskih vojnika iz Domovinskog rata, a napose vojne operacije Oluje, nakon što je 2002.-2003. osvojio vlast, također uz potporu crkvenih aktivista u Hrvatskoj i iseljeništvu, nikad nisu brinuli HDZ ni Sanadera.
Miklenić u svojoj kampanji za priznanje izborne pobjede Sanadera, koji još nema mandat formirati vladu, navodi “više od petnaest tisuća poginulih u velikosrpskoj agresiji na Hrvatsku, desetke tisuća ranjenih i trajno traumatiziranih i ratna razaranja koja je pretrpjela hrvatska baština i gospodarstvo kao i osamostaljenje i oslobađanje Hrvatske od komunističkog totalitarizma,” a prešućuje da su Sanader i HDZ sve to izdali, napose zapovjednike vojnih operacija koji su zaustavili sve te tragedije i oslobodili Hrvatsku.
Sanader je dakle dobio bianco mjenicu za vlast i ovaj puta, unatoč svim izdajama. Kako je Sanader tražio priznanje od oporbe, prije nego što je okupio većinu potrebnu za formiranje vlade, da je pobjednik, u ime demokracijskih načela (JL, 26.11.), tako se sada Miklenić zalaže, skoro istim riječima, za «demokratski poredak» i da se Sanaderu «čestita» na pobjedi.
Prvo čestitajmo Sanaderu na izdaji svih onih preko 150.000 prosvjednika na Splitskoj rivi, s kojim je prosvjedovao protiv progona generala Norca 2001, tek da bi došao na vlast, i onda ga se javno odrekao. Sudi mu se i danas. Potom mu čestitajmo na izdaji generala Gotovine. Dok se Hrvatska optužuje kao država nastala na zločinu, zbog svoje obrane, za Miklenčića je «anticivilizacijsko ponašanje» tek odugovlačenje procedure oko Sanaderova ponovna zasjedanja u fotelju.
Vrijeme je reći da su neki crkveni aktivisti i prije izbora izabrali «manje zlo», HDZ sa Sanaderom na čelu, i to ne prvi puta.
Da ne bude zabuna, ništa nemam protiv uloge Katoličke Crkve u političkom životu Hrvatske. Općenito u usporedbi s izravnom ulogom drugih religija u političkom životu, uloga Katoličke crkve je nedostatna u Hrvatskoj. Pada u moralnu sferu.
I upravo tu padaju neki crkveni aktivisti. Upavo je Glas Koncila pozivao na predaju haaškom sudištu generala Gotovinu, da se tako još jedanput žrtvuje za Hrvatsku. Hrvatska je dobila novac od Europe i svijeta za tu izdaju. A opet je u dugu koji će teretiti i buduće generacije, u kakvu Hrvatska nije bila ni u ratno vrijeme.
Dakle, gdje je u svemu tome pravda i opće dobro. Slični crkveni dužnosnici će danas reći, čak u Dijaspori, da se cijela Hrvatska digne na noge, generala Gotovinu Haag neće pustiti na slobodu. Znači, čemu se zalagati!? Dakle, neko Sanaderovo i biskupsko jamstvo za generala Gotovinu da bi se branio sa slobode izgleda tek kao pilatsko pranje ruku.
Sanaderu se jedino prašta, samo je njegova vlast povod zabrinutosti za hrvatsko društvo.
Istina je da bi neka druga opcija u Hrvatskoj danas mogla biti i gora. Predsjednik Mesić sastavlja buduću hrvatsku vladu, a HDZ je prevagnuo zahvaljujući glasovima iz iseljeništva. Ali i Mesića je «stvorio HDZ». Osim toga, Sanader se redovito hvali dobrim odnosima s Mesićem.
Crkveni dužnosnici su s ponosom znali reći da nijedna hrvatska organizacija u iseljeništvu ne može uspjeti bez potpore Crkve, i tome se nitko nije protivio. Hrvatska je katolička zemlja i podrška, barem moralna, od hrvatskih katoličkih misija je kako potrebna tako i poželjna.
Ali danas, kad se može birati samo između izdajničkog HDZ-a i lijevih, što je sve – samo lijevo, i izdaja Hrvatske, nameće se pitanje odgovornosti za takvu situaciju.
Svi koji su se usprotivili HDZ-u i svim njegovim izdajama, po nalogu su HDZ-a sustavno sabotirani i izolirani iz hrvatskog društvenog života bilo u Hrvatskoj ili svijetu. Čak se i glasovi oporbe s desnice što se održala u javnom životu Hrvatske preklapaju s aktivistima za HDZ. Jesu li i u ovim činjeničnim stvarima crkveni dužnosnici posredovali, pitanje je za purgatorij svakomu tko ga sebi postavi.
Na kraju, ako je «manje zlo» prihvatljivo za obične ljude kojima je dano na znanje da tu ne mogu ništa učiniti, kako je to moguće kod onih koji su simbol dobra, znanja i mudrosti, i naše moralne vođe.
Očekivati neko dobro od HDZ-a, postalo je sumorno beznađe.
Neka Miklenić et al. bolje odgoje nekog političara od Sanadera i HDZ-a, pa nam ga ponude u ime «općeg dobra», za što je Crkva imala već 15 godina otkako je Hrvatska samostalna. Za to se možemo moliti, kao i za njih, ali ne više i za njihove današnje omiljene političare.
Sanader je unio zabune u sve hrvatske vrijednosti i svatko tko je s njim imao posla, iskompromitirao se, na ovaj ili onaj način, a ako je upozorio na njegove izdaje, završio je u HDZ-ovu purgatoriju. Izuzev za one što šute, propuste reći istinu, i podržavaju sve njegove izdaje – oni se nemaju na što žaliti. Sve se danas može kupiti ili prodati.
Drugim riječima, Sanader i HDZ su prokockali priliku osuditi komunizam, izdali su sve hrvatske patriote, i domovinu, Haag joj sudi. Ili u HDZ-ovu rječniku, tako često upućenom njegovim protivnicima, Sanader je «ispaljena patrona». Zašto neki crkveni dužnosnici još računaju na njega, samo Bog zna.
Vrijeme je za pravu istinu. HDZ nije hrvatska vjera. Sanader nije naš Bog, kojem je, svejedno, trebalo skupo plaćati neposlušnost. Ne moramo se klanjati zlatnom teletu, niti HDZ-u. Isti su, i HDZ i SDP, ali Mesića je HDZ «stvorio» i to je ta hrvatska agonija.
|
Democracy Blog Archive Who said there was no life on Mars? Cicak in "European, Racan's and Sanader's Croatia" calls for murder? Bastards, bastards!
The “secrets” of Croatian diplomacy and politics made public (CROATIA – WWI; Croatian mothers – Human rights; Croatia – Italy scandal; Croatia – ICTY / EU; Croatia, Ah Croatia….) The "elites" advance nonsense Decadence and Threat to Croatia: No Army, no Pope; only certain sciences and politics safe
Democracy spinning on the cat's tail in Croatia EC spies on Croatia's night life even! Let's not wait for Sanader's moment with Savo Strbac Sanader, Mesić and Croatian Parliament must resign Braking news! Over 100 political parties’ bosses in Croatia… Sanader: "Tko će me, ah, tko će me konačno, muški ?" Tko je rekao da nema života na Marsu? Čičak u "europskoj, Sanaderovoj i Račanovoj Hrvatskoj" poziva na ubojstvo? Banda !
JAVNO o "tajnama" hrvatske politike i diplomacije (Hrvatska - 1. svj. rat ; Hrvatske majke - Ljudska prava ; Diplomatski skandal: Hrvatska - Italija ; Hrvatska - MKS/EU; Hrvatska, Ah Hrvatska...)
"Elite" žure u bezveznost
Dekadencija i prijetnja Hrvatskoj: Ni vojska, ni Papa; samo određene znanosti i političari zaštićeni Objesili demokraciju mačku o rep u Hrvatskoj EK špijunira čak i hrvatski noćni život! Ne treba čekati Sanaderov trenutak sa Savom Štrbcom Sanader, Mesić i Hrvatski sabor moraju odstupiti s vlasti Najnovije vijesti! Preko 100 sefova politickih stranaka u Hrvatskoj
|
|
|
Conspiracies revisited
THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST CROATIA, EUROPE?
Lt, 03 Dec 2007
There’s less and less concrete news about post-electoral Croatia and its leftist coalitions in the making by either SDP or HDZ. Croatian politicians seem to have entered a conspiracy stage, in silence.
Croatian public has nothing to do with them any longer. The farce of voting is over.
British, Brussels’ and other world figures are now weighing more than Croatians in forming new coalitions and the government. The key Tel Aviv’s Rabin is also rushing to Zagreb. World politicians are impatient, too. In foreign media, Croatians are painted again as radicals, Nazis, Ustashes (now via Thompson singer).
All the criticism against the government is silenced, except for some local outlets that will sooner or later pay for it. Then, Croatia will pay the price of its betrayals. And then, Europe.
It’s hard to persevere in the struggle with a raison d’ętre while many believe “we have Croatia,” and that’s it. But Croatian affairs have never been just a Croatian matter. Croatia was the rampart of western civilization and many times through the history it saved Europe. It defeated the assaults from Tartars, Ottomans, Chetniks and communists, and many other hostile parties. Croatia has always won when it recognized its enemies.
However, Croatia of today fires its worst weapons against its best soldiers and patriots, pacifies protesting voices, and blocks resistance, with a modest proposal of adhering to the lesser evil for all those who present solid facts about betrayals.
If that’s Croatia, if we have Croatia, Croatians graced with patriotic and religious ideal cannot forever turn their love of Croatia into scandalous discoveries of betrayals within all Croatian state and public institutions. It’s a painful task.
It becomes an idiotism to continue the straggle against one’s own country that has no more objections to what’s happening to it. However, shall we wait until our rampart of Christianity is being plunged deeper and deeper into Western Balkan, or some new version of Yugoslavia?
Whatever Mgr. Strossmayer, Trumbic and certain other conceivers of Yugoslav ideas dreamt about, Yugoslavias were always serving Serbian Chetniks, Russian orthodoxy, or communists, with a tragic cost for entire Croatian people. The same will be the cost of Sanader’s, Milanovic’s and Mesic’s Western Balkan today.
If Croatia wanted to become a leader of the Western Balkan, why would it betray its homeland war heroes who liberated it? How this question can be so systematically ignored? Who has ever obtained some respect on the international scene without skilled soldiers and solid military force? But Sanader and Mesić count on NATO, in which each member-country, first and foremost, counts on itself. Or perhaps, on Russia.
There’s an Afghanistanization of Kosovo and Bosnia happening, while Croatian Catholic patriots are suppressed everywhere, either in the name of some close cooperation with Croatia’s enemy of Serbia, or in the name of ecumenism. Croatian religion, which was always Catholic one since the 7th century, is becoming suppressed again, even in Croatia. The believers are turning increasingly more liberal, or confused, and distant.
There might be a plot behind all this so to tear down the rampart of civilization, then approach and ruin Europe, too.
If we observe the global politics and media, we shall see how much hatred is being spread against both Croatia and Europe (only the traitors are welcomed, in good standing, and praised). The most striking is that the same global lobbies, interlaced among themselves, push Europe into liberalism, while simultaneously spreading hatred against Europe, either for its liberalism or its resistance, where the latter is labeled as “extremist,” “radical” or accused of “radicalization of the people”! Such paradox can only announce Croatia, the rampart of Christianity falling down, dangerously.
It’s not known if Croatia will then fall in Saladin’s way, or modern Afghanistan-Iraq way, followed by Europe. In the first case, "liberation" would take place via islamization, in the latter, via NATO, if not via Russia.
As Croatia’s liberation of 1991-1995 wasn’t good enough, becoming even “criminal,” we can only wonder what kind of “liberators” Croatian leaders are serving to today, given that NATO was serviced by pro-Serb Yugoslav Army's war criminal Kadijevic, and Russia is protecting him. Kadijevic wished to smash Croatia.
There was a conspiracy theory that revealed itself in France published on the blog (How will wars end up forever in Europe):
.....................................................................
Poor Europe, and Croatia, with them: While the one (PM Sanader) supports foreign wars that some fear could result in less security in Europe (and in the US too, but Europe proved to be more sensitive to the Islam-Christianity clashes than the US judging from islamic reaction to Danish cartoons and recent Benedict XVI speach), the other (president Mesic) promises no more wars in the United Europe. Will Europe (and perhaps the US too) just surrender once the islamist terrorism gains the ground?
This becomes terrific when we consult the authority on the US politics, Bernard Lewis, and see what he once said for Humanities, July/August 2006, Volume 27/Number 4:
"As far as I'm concerned, what really matters is the clash between Christendom and Islam, which begins with the advent of Islam and is continued to the present day."
But it works in a strange way according to this author:
"The most extraordinary moment was when Monsieur Jean-Pierre Raffarin--then French prime minister--in a speech in the National Assembly on October 8, 2002, was speaking of Saddam Hussein. He said, "One of Saddam Hussein's great heroes is Saladin." And in case his listeners in the French chamber didn't know, he said, "It was Saladin who was able to defeat the Crusaders and liberate Jerusalem.".... Liberate..(Ibid)
Who will liberate Europe in the event of the war. Muslims? And then, what? Mr. Bush, Mr. Sanader, Mr. Tadic, Mr. Mesic make up a strange crowd, but pershaps not so paradoxical in their politics as it may seem on the surface. .....................................................................
Now, it comes to my mind the question asked by Daniel Pipes:
Did you know that I had a hand in the Danish cartoons of Muhammad?(Those Danish Cartoons and Me, by Daniel Pipes, New York Sun, February 21, 2006)
Wonder not if he had.
|
Objavljeno na
UROTA PROTIV HRVATSKE, EUROPE?
Lt, 3. 12. 2007
Sanader and Kostunica parading in front of Serbian army
Sve je manje i manje konkretnih vijesti iz postizborne Hrvatske u svezi formiranja ljevičarskih koalicija bile one SDP-ove ili HDZ-ove. Hrvatski političari su ušli u urotnički stadij, u tišini.
Hrvatska javnost više ništa nema s tim. Farsa od glasovanja je završena.
Britanske, brusselske i druge svjetske figure sada teže više od Hrvata u formiranju novih koalicija i vlade. Glavni rabin Tel Aviva također žuri u Zagreb. Svjetski političari su također nestrpljivi. U stranim medijima, Hrvati su ponovno označeni kao radikali, nacisti, ustaše (sad preko pjevača Thompsona).
Svaka kritika protiv vlade je utišana, izuzev u pojedinim lokalnim publikacijama koje će prije ili kasnije platiti za to. Potom će Hrvatska platiti cijenu svojih izdaja. A potom, i Europa.
Teško je objektivno izdržati u borbi kad mnogi vjeruju “imamo Hrvatsku,” i to je sve. Ali hrvatski poslovi nikad nisu bili samo hrvatska stvar. Hrvatska je bila štit zapadne civilizacije i više puta u povijesti spasila je Europu. Porazila je nasrtanja Tartara, Otomana, četnika, komunista i drugih neprijatelja. Hrvatska uvijek pobjeđuje kad prepozna svoje neprijatelje.
Međutim, današnja Hrvatska pali svoje najgore oružje protiv svojih najboljih vojnika i domoljuba, pacificira glasove prosvjeda i blokira otpor, sa skromnim prijedlogom da se udruže s manjim zlom svi oni koji iznesu čvrste dokaze o izdaji.
Ako je to Hrvatska, ako imamo Hrvatsku, Hrvati obdareni domoljubnim i vjerskim idealima ne mogu vječito okrećati svoju ljubav za Hrvatsku u skandalozna otkrića izdaje unutar svih hrvatskih državnih i javnih ustanova. Mukotrpna je to zadaća.
Postaje idiotski nastaviti bitku protiv vlastite zemlje koja na sve što joj se događa nema prigovora. Ali, treba li čekati da predziđe kršćanstva potone sve dublje i dublje u Zapadni Balkan, ili neku novu inačicu Jugoslavije.
Štogod da su biskup Strossmayer, Trumbić i neki drugi utemeljitelji jugoslavenske ideje o tome sanjali, Jugoslavija je uvijek služila samo srpskim četnicima, ruskim pravoslavcima ili komunistima. Isto će biti sa Sanaderovim, Milanovićevim i Mesićevim Zapadnim Balkanom danas.
Ako je Hrvatska željela postati predvodnica Zapadnog Balkana, zašto je izdala heroje domovinskog rata koji su je oslobodili? Kako je moguće da se ovo pitanje sustavno ignorira? Kad je netko postigao nešto na međunardnoj sceni bez umješnih vojnika i jake vojne sile? Ali Sanader i Mesić računaju na NATO, gdje svaka članica računa prije svega na samu sebe.
Događa se afganistanizacija Kosova i Bosne, a hrvatski, katolički domoljubi svagdje su pod pritiskom, bilo u ime bliske suradnje s hrvatskim neprijateljem u Srbiji, bilo u ime ekumene. Hrvatska vjera, katolička od stoljeća sedmog, ponovno se guši, čak i u Hrvatskoj. Vjernici su sve liberalniji, ili zbunjeni i distantni.
Možda se radi o uroti da se štit civilizacije sruši, potom neprijatelj približi te unitiši i Europu.
Ako pratimo globalnu politiku i medije, vidjet ćemo koliko se mržnje širi i protiv Hrvatske i Europe (samo su izdajice dobrodošli, na dobru glasu). Nadasve uznemirava što isti globalni lobbyiji, koji su međusobno povezani, guraju Europu u liberalizam, dok istovremeno šire mržnju protiv Europe, bilo zbog njezina liberalizma, ili otpora gdje je potonje označeno kao “ekstremizam,” “radikalizam,” ili je pod optužbom radikalizacije naroda! Takav paradoks može samo najaviti opasan pad Hrvatske, predziđa civilizacije.
Nije poznato hoće li Hrvatska pasti na Saladinov način, ili moderni, afganistansko-irački način, a onda i Europa. U prvom slučaju, oslobođenje bi došlo islamizacijom, u potonjem, preko NATO-a, ako ne Rusije.
Ako hrvatski rat oslobođenja od 1991-1995 nije dostatno dobar, pa je još “zločinački,” možemo se samo čuditi kakvoj vrsti osloboditelja služe hrvatski čelnici danas, s tim da je NATO servisirao, a Rusija štiti i ratnog zločinca iz pro-srpske Jugoslavenske armije Kadijevića koji je želio uništiti Hrvatsku.
Na ovom blogu jedanput je objavljena urotnička teorija koja se otkrila u Francuskoj (Ratovi zauvijek nestaju u Europi? Pogledajmo kako...):
.....................................................................
Jadna Europe, i Hrvatska, s njima: dok jedan (Sanader) podržava strane ratove za koje neki strahuju da će rezultirati padom sigurnosti u Europi (a i u SAD-u, međutim Europa se pokazala osjetljivijom od SAD-a na sukobe Islama i Kršćanstva, sudeći po reakcijama na Danske crtiće i govor Sv. Oca Pape Benedikta XVI); drugi (Mesic) obećava nestanak rata u ujedinjenoj Europi. Hoće li se Europa (a možda i SAD) jednostavno predati kad islamski terorizam nađe plodno tlo?
Ovo postane strašno kad se konzultiramo s auteritetom američke politike, Bernardom Lewis, i vidimo što je on izjavio za Humanities, July/August 2006, Volume 27/Number 4:
"Što se mene tiče, ono što je doista važno je sukob između Kršćanstva i Islama, koji traje od adventa Islama do dana današnjega."
Ali to radi na čudan način sudeći po ovom autoru:
"Najveći trenutak je bio kad je gosp. Jean-Pierre Raffarin-- bivši francuski premijer -- u govoru nacionalnom vijeću od 8. listopada 2002 govorio o Saddamu Husseinu. Rekao je, 'Jedan od najvećih heroja Saddama Husseina je Saladin." U slučaju da njegovi slušatelji u francuskoj odaji ne znaju, rekao je, 'To je Saladin koji je bio sposoban poraziti Križare i osloboditi Jerusalem.'" ... Osloboditi... (Ibid)
Tko će osloboditi Europu u slučaju rata? Muslimani? I što poslije? Gospoda Bush, Sanader, Tadic i Mesic čudna su klapa, ali možda i ne tako paradoksalna u svojoj politici kako izgleda na površini. .....................................................................
Sada mi pada na pamet pitanje koje je postavio Daniel Pipes:
Jeste li znali da sam ja imao prste u danskim karikaturama Muhameda?(Those Danish Cartoons and Me, by Daniel Pipes, New York Sun, February 21, 2006)
Ne čudi ako jest.
|
||
|
Balkan Bush (Sanader) or Balkan Tito (Milanovic): It's all the same IA 22 Nov 2007
At last, HDZ and SDP seem to reap their first results from their systematic brain-washing in Croatia and impose themselves as the only choice at the coming elections. As only a tiny 1 percent is said to separate them from the predominance in the governmental wheelchair, no one else should have anything to fight for…
Equally their opponents and partisans, as well as impartial observers, have agreed over pre-electoral season that there’s no difference among hidden “Bush of the Balkans” (Ivo Sanader) and open communist Tito’s fan (Zoran Milanovic). Croatia is getting two-in-one party system of governance, a dictatorship.
Milanovic has already promised that there would be no criminal prosecution against their former opponents, HDZ, obviously, should SDP win. These two parties are offering such warranties one to another for almost a decade now – or handing over the political control from hand to hand inside their closed ring.
They will apparently continue to persecute the volunteers of the Homeland war who liberated the country, including all those who don’t fight for their own accounts, but those of national importance, and against their treason and crimes.
The conflict between HDZ and SDP certainly isn’t in their best interest, because their politics demand continuity; otherwise, many within both HDZ and SDP would face responsibility for their wrongdoings.
The journalist Davor Butkovic, Sanader’s ally, particularly since he accompanied him at their visit to the US, gives a special care to polishing everything that Milanovic says against Bush of the Balkans. He regularly slaps both HDZ and SDP for their scandalous discoveries about each other each time they become serious about their opposition. He explains that Sanader’s scandals are «less important» now (corruption, betrayals, lies…). When will they become important?
Of course, Butkovic is Sanader's gentle watchdog, and he also envies him for his shrinking back to the «rightist» rhetoric during some local campaigns, but he still puts all hopes in him. He just knows, if Sanader wins on the «right wing» speech, there are too many lies and even one too many would no longer let him survive for more than a couple of months (if he wins). And who needs what he calls “rightist inclinations” after all, given that the implementation of one- or two-party system with the same mindset, based on the communist-style persecutions, have been prepared really thoroughly.
If we feared a bi-polar political system, we get even worse: a monopolistic system and nothing else. Plural democracy turned into a pure nonsense in Croatian experiment.
We can only be consoled if Sanader – a proven traitor – be punished and beaten at least by his fate-deciding 1 percent. Nowadays, we know how to treat communist leaders such as Tito, while our Bush of the Balkans confused all the values and compromised everything that was considered the matter of trust – and that of a real state or democracy! The masked enemy has always been the worst. And Sanader’s just the worst edition of Bush of the Balkan, and as such, he couldn’t do better.
It would be interesting to know how real Bush sees real Tito. I don’t think he’d be against him, on the contrary. Hence, there’s no point in voting as there is no choice: Milanovic praises Tito openly, Sanader conforms to him silently. Both stand up for Serbia on the international scene, which reveals the substance of their only real diplomatic activity.
The fact that HDZ spends millions of dollars on their campaign – more than all their opposition together – is probably one last test which will show how much money can buy. But the honour and trust – it can buy never again.
Perhaps we should bypass media manipulations, go and vote, so to see what that «1 percent» means and try prevent the brainwashing imposed by 2 in 1 party campaing. All those who want us beleive that the electoral struggle is run only between HDZ and SDP might get a surprise – if the electoral results are not fixed in advance, as per usual...
Whatever happens, HDZ won't go very far. Even if Butkovic regularly bails them out, Bush of the Balkan (Sanader) or Tito of the Balkan (Milanovic), it's all the same. Bush of the Balkans is only more «experienced» and brutal in his treason and Milosevic-style government against Croatian patriots.
|
Realna slika Balkanski Bush (Sanader), ili Balkanski Tito (Milanovic), isto je to IA 22. studenoga 2007. Predizborno medijsko ispiranje mozga u Hrvatskoj je izgleda napokon uspjelo: HDZ i SDP su se nametnuli kao jedini izbor na predstojećim izborima. Samo ih 1 posto dijeli od prevage u foteljama, i nizašto se drugo eto nitko drugi nema boriti. Većina protivnika i zagovornika, kao i objektivnih promatrača, kroz ovo se predizborno vrijeme složila da nema razlike između Balkanskog Busha (Ive Sanadera) i javnog Titina štovatelja (Zorana Milanovića), tako da Hrvatska zapravo dobiva jednopartijski sustav vladavine i diktaturu. Milanović je već obećao, HDZ-u očito, da neće biti progona za kriminalne radnje ukoliko SDP pobijedi, što ove dvije stranke jamče jedna drugoj već skoro jedno desetljeće, odnosno prenose vlast iz ruke u ruku. Progonit će, dakle, i dalje samo branitelje koji su oslobodili tu državu, i one što se ne znaju boriti samo za svoj račun, nego za neki od veće važnosti, protiv njihove izdaje i kriminala. Nitko od njih, naime, nije niti želio sukob HDZ-a i SDP-a, jer njihova politika izdaje traži kontinuitet, u protivnom netko bi za nju mogao i odgovarati, kako u HDZ-u tako i SDP-u. Pogotovo se za to brinuo novinar Davor Butković, koji je, vjerni pratitelj Balkanskog Busha Sanadera i na putu u Ameriku, svaki puta dao packu i HDZ-u i SDP-u za skandale koje iznose, kad bi se previše uživjeli u protivničke uloge. I naravno oprao bi Sanadera od tih «nevažnih stvari» o njegovim skandalima (korupcija, laž, izdaja...). Kad će postati važni? Butković je naravno Sanaderov watchdog, te pažljivo skrbi i da tko ne bi previše otišao udesno, ne zato što se boji za njega, ima Butković puno povjerenje u Sanadera. Valjda zna, ako na «desničarenju» Sanader pobijedi, bit će mu to previše laži i još koja previše bi ga već u nekoliko mjeseci mogla srušiti (ako pobijedi). A to mu očito ne treba jer su sve pripreme za jednoumlje i jednopartijski sustav obavljene, makar se uvodile preko dvije stranke. Ako smo se i bojali dvopartijskog sustava, ipak smo dobili, već unaprijed, jednopartijski. Jedina utjeha će biti ako se barem dokazani izdajica, Ivo Sanader, kazni i izgubi taj «presudni 1%» o kojem vjesi njegova sudbina. S Titom barem znamo kako ćemo, a Balkanski Bush je sve vrijednosti pomutio i razbio i iskompromitirao sve što se smatralo «državotvornim». Ipak je on samo Balkanski Bush, u svom najgorem izdanju kakvo i može biti balkansko izdanje. Ako ni Bush nema ništa protiv Tite, onoga iz komunističkih vremena, nego naprotiv, onda doista tu niti nema nekih hrvatskih izbora i čemu na njih izlaziti. Milanović slavi Titu javno, a Sanader mu služi potajno, premda ga i on zna rado citirati. Obadva se zalažu za Srbiju na međunarodnoj sceni, što otkriva bit svih njihovih stvarnih diplomatskih aktivnosti. Zašto onda HDZ troši tolike milijune na kampanju, koliko sva oporba skupa, makar i prividna bila, vjerojatno je posljednji test koji će pokazati što sve novac može kupiti. Ali povjerenje i ugled više nikada. Možda ipak treba preskočiti medijske manipulacije, izići i glasovati, pa da vidimo što je «1 posto» razlike, i može li se doista nemetnuti jednoumlje. Svi oni koji nameću mišljenje da se bitka vodi samo između HDZ-a i SDP-a mogli bi se iznenaditi rezultatima, ako budu pošteni, a ne namješteni kao i obično... Kako bilo, HDZ, ne će daleko. Makar ga i Butković stalno izvlačio... Balkanski Bush (Sanader), ili Balkanski Tito (Milanović), isto je to. Balkanski Bush je sada tek iskusniji i brutalniji u izdaji i progonima hrvatskih patriota na kakvu stilu vladavine bi mu i Milošević zavidio.
|
||
|
HDZ’s forgery or not? – Bilaver and Bush in Croatia’s electoral campaign IA 17 Nov 2007 Croatian elections have been a real farce so far. The mainstream media only shows the candidates who don’t really differ but pretend to participate in a two-party competition. Actually, they seem to be coordinated by the journalist Davor Butkovic and the political analyst Davor Gjenero, given that HDZ and SDP quite loyally follow their instructions as to when to ease the attack, when to withdraw it, so that they don’t get too compromised in front of the public by all that they can reproach to each other, especially to Sanader…
I thought to close my eyes until all is over, but there appeared there again a man still worth a good laugh, or perhaps a cry…
Hence, Bilaver hasn’t left us without his dark humor neither in this electoral season, although, during the last one, he called for hanging certain people who quit Sanader’s camp, while now, he proposes hugging… with president Bush. Their opponents still can expect the worst…
A prominent Croatian freelance journalist Ms. Diana Majhen warned “Beware of HDZ.” “After the lies, the forgery has become HDZ’s next [public] step” she notes. This forgery was “meant to increase importance of HDZ as a party whose members are supported, and cuddled even by president Bush.” She believes Bilaver shouldn’t have a difficulty to get a snap with president Bush even without forging it…
I would propose an optional title for the forgery made of the “original Bilaver” (next to Sanader) and the “original Bush” (next to Croatian minister of culture): “Bilaver erased Sanader and put Bush next to himself.”
Here we have a living proof that the love out of legitimate marriage disappears sooner or later, even the most passionate one. Remember, Bilaver so often threatened even to kill those who oppose Sanader. However, he has always justified it by “higher (party) interests.” Who would know better Sanader’s party interests? He knows what Sanader approves of now and tries to please him, one more time.
Some top HDZ members in + used to say openly that “we (Croatians) should give all to the Americans” and that’s it. Therefore, this forgery isn’t so funny, although it’s hard to stop laughing at it – at least for a while. See the photo here.
|
Objavljeno također na
HDZ-ov falsifikat ili ne? – Bilaver i Bush u hrvatskoj izbornoj kampanji
IA 17. studeni 2007. Hrvatski izbori su zasada istinska farsa. Glavni mediji pokazuju samo kandidate koji se uistinu ne razlikuju ali glume da su u nekoj dvopartijskoj konkurenciji. Izgleda da ih usmjerava novinar Davor Butkovic i politički analitičar Davor Djenero, jer obadvije stranke slijede njihove naputke: kad treba smanjiti napad, kad treba posve prestati… da se ne iskompromitiraju pred javnosti, obzirom na sve što se o njima može reći, napose o Sanaderu…
Mislila sam upravo zatvoriti oči dok sve ne prođe, ali pojavio se opet u medijima jedan čovjek vrijedan smijaha. Ili možda suza…
Jedan hrvatski tjednik objavio je naslov: «Bilaver izbrisao Biškupića i uz Busha stavio sebe». Radi se o falsifikatu fotografije koja se pojavila na službenim stranicama američkog HDZ-a. Frank Bilaver je član središnjeg odbora i nacionalnog vijeća HDZ-a, koji je uvijek imao «punu podršku» premijera Sanadera….
Tako nas Bilaver nije ostavio bez svog crnog humora ni ove izborne sezone, premda za razliku od prošle, kad je predlagao vješanje nekih ljudi koji su napustili Sanaderov kamp, sad predlaže grljenje… s predsjednikom Bushom. Njihovim protivnicima, i dalje je očekivati najgore…
Ugledna hrvatska slobodna novinarka Diana Majhen upozorila je «Oprez, HDZ». «Sa laganja, HDZ je otišao štengu gore. Sada se [javno] bavi i falsificiranjem.» Zapazit će: «time se vjerojatno htjelo dati na važnosti samom HDZ-u kao stranci koju podupire i sa njenim se članovima grli čak i predsjednik Bush.» Vjeruje da je Bilaver bez problema mogao doći do slike s predsjednikom Bushom i bez falsifikata…
Ja bih predložila jedan alternativni naslov za falsifikat od “original Bilavera” (pored premijera Sanadera) i “original Busha” (pored hrvatskog ministra kulture): «Bilaver izbrisao Sanadera i uz sebe stavio Busha».
Dobili smo dokaz da izvanbračna ljubav, čak i najstrastvenija, prolazi prije ili kasnije. Podsjetimo, Bilaver je znao prijetiti i smrću Sanaderovim protivnicima. Ipak, on je to uvijek opravdavao “višim (stranačkim) interesima.” Tko bi bolje od njega znao što je Sanaderov stranački interes? Zna što Sanader odobrava i pokušava mu se dodvoriti, još jedanput.
Neki vodeći članovi HDZ-a u Canadi, bliski Bilaveru, znali su reći da mi Hrvati “sve trebamo dati Amerikancima” i riješena stvar. Stoga, ovaj falsifikat i nije tako smiješan, premda je teško zaustaviti smijeh – barem zakratko. Pogledajte slike ovdje.
|
||
|
My contribution to Sanader’s electoral campaign?! IA
01 Nov 2007
Today, for a change, I opened my spam folder to see how the maniacs from Ivica Sanader’s “cyber-terrorist camp” are doing. Very bad. I apologise in advance for I cannot reproduce everything here: Sanader’s fans are dreadful again.
The letter I opened (only one) is telling, it’s a kind of “thank-you letter” for helping Sanader win elections.
“What do you say, Sanader seems to be winning again?! I think you, too, have contributed to that via your Internet writing,” says Ivica Ban alias Orsat right after his usual, sexual-maniac-style introduction meant to defend Sanader’s manly honour in all its perversity. It is part of their openly stated task to force me to hate all that’s manly, given that I couldn’t recognize a real (Croatian) man in Sanader. How could I...
Last time I received a thank-you letter concerning elections, was many moons before, around the time when Sanader opposed war crime indictments against Croatian generals at Split rally.
Since then, he betrayed all that he promised to do, or not to do. He’s acting as prime minister of the tribunal in The Hague, and not Croatia, ever since.
Therefore, I wonder in what my writing might have helped him now in his electoral campaign. I see... The selection criteria for electoral candidates and winners is no longer determined by Croatian people but the tribunal in The Hague and an unconditional cooperation with it. Democracy has deteriorated badly in Croatia, as well as “civility” in Croatia’s electoral camps. Majority only prays to God to spare them of unbearable electoral campaigns in Croatia.
Finally, if I note that Sanader has some strange inclinations towards the men, will that help him, too, to win the coming elections in Croatia? Well, gays, you're going back to spamfighter.
|
Moja pomoć Sanaderu na izborima?!
IA
1. studenog 2007
Danas sam za promjenu otvorila pretinac za spam i pogledala što se zbiva s manijacima iz “terorističkog inernet kampa” Ivice Sanadera. Strašno. Unaprijed se ispričavam jer ne mogu sve što piše prenijeti ovdje: Sanaderovi obožavatelji su opet ubitačni.
Pismo koje sam otvorila (i to samo jedno), neka je vrsta pisma zahvale za pomoć Sanaderu da pobijedi na izborima.
“Što veliš Ivo Sanader izgleda opet pobjedjuje ?! Mislim kako si i ti svojim Internet upisima tome doprinjela ...,” piše Ivica Ban alias Orsat odmah nakon uobičajenog uvoda u stilu seksualnog manijaka koji brani Sanaderovu mušku čast u svoj njezinoj perverznosti. To je dio njihove otvoreno najavljene zadaće da me prisile zamrziti sve što je muško jer nisam prepoznala istinskog (hrvatskog) muža u Sanaderu. Kako bih mogla…
Prošla je cijela vječnost odkad sam zadnji puta primila kakvo pismo zahvale za izbore, još za vremena kad se Sanader usprotivio optužbama za ratni zločin protiv hrvatskih generala na Splitskoj rivi.
Poslije toga, izdao je sve što je obećao da će učiniti ili ne učiniti. Ponaša se redovito kao premijer haaškog suda, a ne Hrvatske.
Stoga me čudi u čemu mu je moje pisanje moglo doprinijeti u današnjoj izbornoj kampanji. Shvaćam. Kriterij odabira izbornih kandidata i pobjednika više ne određuje hrvatski narod nego haaški sud i bezuvjetna suradnja s njim. Demokracija u Hrvatskoj se srozala krajnje nisko, kao i civiliziranost u « hrvatskim » izbornim kampovima. Većina moli Boga jedino da ih poštedi tih nesnosnih izbornih kampanja u Hrvatskoj.
Napokon, ako primijetim da Sanader ima neke čudne sklonosti i prema muškarcima, hoće li mu i to pomoći pobijediti na izborima u Hrvatskoj ? Natrag pederi u spamfighter!
|
||
|
Hornless in NYC, horned in Croatia IA 22 Oct 2007 Who else but Ivo Sanader: In NYC, he was hornless, he praised to the heavens The Hague’s tribunal ICTY because of which were imprisoned even Croatian journalists, not to mention Croatian Homeland war volunteers and heroes, and for which he demolished all principles and instruments of national security in Croatia.
In Croatia, however, Sanader is horned, as usual. Especially in the wake of elections in Croatia, his real nature and the interest group he serves to are seeing the light of day. And he's not even ashamed of it!
Following his move in defense of Zeljko Peratovic, the journalist who invested so much effort in criminalization of Croatia’s Homeland war to the point to get sick of it, and who was found to be working for the British intelligence that labeled him as an “imbecile” but “useful nevertheless,” Sanader “honored” even his opposition by saying that they “didn’t know if they’d p..ss or sh..t.!"
Voila the culture of Croatian prime minister I was warning about for so long time, and which I felt on my own skin. His party HDZ knows well what kind of maniacs Sanader used to employ over these past 5 years so to insult and slander all of us who were just quoting him and showing whose interests he defends! Sanader’s maniacs (e.g. Orsat) were impossible to quote, that was so ugly, but now when the prime minister uses their vocabulary, we must face his “culture” and distance from it. Especially now when it’s promoted by Croatia’s prime minister in person!
Let's go back to Peratovic case. Suddenly it's “without precedent” that a journalist was arrested (and liberated by Sanader), and everyone behaves as if they’ve fallen from Mars (again), from prime minister to Croatian Helsinki committee to Croatian journalist society, as if such arrests weren’t a regular practice over the past years within Sanader’s “action plans” that were identical in their nature to those of communists or Milosevic and yugo-cetniks.
Susanne Bunjevac was also arrested as soon as she announced to say something to the journalists (Zagorec case) so that we no longer hear abut her. It's hard to tell whether Peratovic case is just a continuation or a “counter attack” (former rather than latter). But it cannot go unnoticed that Peratovic has almost never written against Zagorec in his “intelligence” stupidities, at least not in those that a normal person was able to read. On the contrary, Peratovic seems to be defending Zagorec. But let’s not speculate about it….
The question is what Sanader has to do with it. Whom he defends. After he betrayed the heroes of the Homeland war, it doesn’t help him much to side with the “journalist” who keeps trying to criminalize Croatia’s war in all possible and impossible ways, and who’s always “sick” when he must face accountability for his wrongdoings. Sanader is suddenly full of pity for him, even though it seems to be about revealing Croatia’s state secret, for which Peratovic was arrested.
Only the ICTY's secrets cannot be revealed, and for that many have felt Sanader's stick. “Pitiable is the state that cannot protect its secrets, which the journalists should protect, be blackmailed for, and imprisoned” but pitiable is not the tribunal (ICTY) for which Sanader was arresting the journalists and sending them even to The Hague, and to make the absurd complete, he was doing it in order to protect president Mesic, while now media speculates that precisely Mesic and his men (Bajic) orchestrated Peratovic’s arrest.
The truth is being concealed from the public. It's not even known what “state secret” Peratovic was about to reveal. All we can asses is that yet another dirty affair is smoothly covered up by Sanader.
There's another Sanader's telling statement that we must note: “If someone set up this game, in view of coming elections, he will be punished,” said Sanader prior to the opening ceremony of Cavtat’s sewage system.
His “p..ss and sh..t“ followed by the above statement are too much even for the sewage system. Because: Who else would know better how his services are operating…. while he’s not pleased with it only when things get out of his control. He knows how many things he has “set up” against his opponents in Croatia (and I, too, have to thank him for “setting up” an invitation to the court an ocean away right after I refused to collaborate with him in his treason of Croatia! and for destroying my career by sabotaging the defense of my master thesis that was never enabled to me in Croatia!, all this after his “thank you letter” for my volunteer work for Croatia). It’s how “democracy” functions in Croatia.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Sanader set up this affair himself. He might have needed it to promote his protection of "media freedoms," all of the sudden… Peratovic is his ally and protegé.
The end of Sanader's tiranny seems to be approaching.... The question is, who will stand up in his defense once he's arrested for all his crimes and betrayals. Probably, Peratovic will render him a service. Then Cicak etc.
Sanader is hornless abroad, but horned in Croatia. It's well known. It was so during the communist criminal Tito's times too.
|
Objavljeno na www.hrvatskauljudba.hr U New Yorku šušat, u Hrvatskoj rogat IA
22. listopada 2007.
Tko drugi nego Ivo Sanader: u New Yorku je bio šušat, ishvalio je do nebesa Sud u Haagu, zbog kojeg su zatvarani i hrvatski novinari, a tek branitelji i heroji, i za koji je srušio sva načela i mehanizme državne sigurnosti u samoj Hrvatskoj.
U Hrvatskoj je Sanader, kao i obično, rogat. Pogotovo pred izbore, njegova skrivana narav i interesna skupina kojoj služi izlazi nemilice na vidjelo. Bez da mu bude neugodno.
Nakon što je u jeku medijske prašine stao u obranu Željka Peratovića, novinara koji je uložio toliko truda, da se sam od nj razbolio, u kriminalizaciju Domovinskog rata, i radio čak i za britanske službe koje ga nazvaše «imbecilom», ali «korisnim», Sanader je usput «počastio» i oporbu prigovorivši joj da «ne zna hoće li piškiti ili kakiti»!
Eto kulture hrvatskog premijera, na koju sam dugo upozoravala, i koju sam ja, kao i mnogi drugi koji mu se suprostavili, osjetila na svojoj koži. HDZ zna kakve je sve manijake Sanader upošljivao tijekom 5 godina da nas vrijeđaju i kleveću, tek zato što smo ga citirali i upozoravali komu služi! Sanaderove manijake (pr., Orsat) bilo je nemoguće citirati, tako su grozni bili, ali kad se premijer izrazi u njihovu duhu, onda treba pogledati u oči takvu «kulturu» i od nje se ograditi! Pogotovo kad je sad osobno premijer predstavalja!
Vratimo se slučaju Peratović. Odjedanput je to «presedan» da je novinar u Hrvatskoj uhićen (i Sanader ga oslobodio), i svi se ponašaju kao da su pali s Marsa (opet), od premijera do HHO-a do HND-a, kao da se takva uhićenja redovito ne događaju već godinama, unutar Sanaderovih «akcijskih planova» koji su identični u svojoj naravi komunističkim, miloševićeviskim i jugo-četničkim planovima.
A i svjedokinja Susanne Bunjevac je uhićena čim je obećala nešto novinarima reći, da više za nju niti čujemo. Jeli Peratovićev slučaj samo nastavak ili «kontra-udar» teško je reći, ali prije ovo prvo. Treba ipak primijetiti, rijetko je on dirao u Zagorca koliko se dalo normalnim ljudima čitati njegove «obavještajne» gluposti. Naprotiv, on izgleda brani Zagorca. Ali ostavimo te špekulacije.
Pitanje je što sad Sanader ima sa svim tim. Koga on brani. Nakon što je izdao heroje Domovinskog rata, nije Sanaderu na čast stati uz takva «novinara» koji isti taj rat na sve moguće i nemoguće načine kriminalizirao, i koji štoviše nije baš «čitav» na što se svaki put izvuče kad treba podnijeti neku odgovornost. Sanader je odjedanput pun milosti, kad se radi o odavanju državne tajne zbog čega je Peratović bio priveden.
Samo se haaške tajne se ne smiju odavati, zbog njih su toliki osjetili Sanaderovu palicu... «Jadna je država koja ne zna čuvati svoje tajne, nego bi to morali za nju činiti novinari, ucijenjeni zatvorom» a nije jadan Sud za koje je Sanader slao i novinare u Haag, i to u zaštitu predsjednika Mesića, da absurd bude veći, jer mediji sumnjiče upravo Mesića i njegove ljude (Bajića) kao naručitelje Peratovićeve afere.
Od javnosti se sve skriva. Ne zna se ni kakvu je državnu tajnu Peratović mislio odati. Mutna li posla koji Sanader opet olako izgladi!
Treba tu primijetiti još jednu znakovitu izjavu Ive Sanadera: «Ako je netko namjestio igru, s obzirom na predizbornu kampanju, taj će biti sankcioniran», - izjavio je Sanader prije svečanog otvaranja cavtatske kanalizacije.
Od njegova «piškiti i kakiti» pa do ove izjave, sve je doista previše i za kanalizaciju. Jer tko bi drugi bolje od premijera znao kako funkcioniraju njegove službe.... jedino što mu se ne sviđa kad ispadnu iz njegove kontrole. Zna on koliko se toga već «namjestilo» u Hrvatskoj pod njegovom palicom (moram se i ja pohvaliti jednom tužbom što mi je namjestio čak preko oceana kad sam odbila suradnju u izdaji Hrvatske, i uništio moju karijeru sabotažom obrane mog magistarskog rada, koja mi nikad nije omogućena, odmah nakon pisma zahvale za moj dragovoljni rad za Hrvatsku!). Tako se to radi u «demokratskoj» Hrvatskoj....
Ne bi me iznenadilo da je Sanader namjestio cijelu aferu oko Peratovica. Moglo mu je to zatrebati da odjedanput može promovirati "medijske slobode." Peratovic je njegov saveznik i štićenik.
Na kraju se ipak sluti kraj Sanaderove tiranije.... Ostaje samo pitanje, tko će stati u njegovu obranu kad on bude priveden za svoje zločine i izdaju. Valjda će mu tad jedino Peratović vratiti uslugu. Pa Čičak, i sl.
Sanader je u svijetu šušat, u Hrvatskoj rogat. Zna se. Tako je to bilo i za komunističkog zločinca Tite.
|
|
|
|
UN Lesson Learned on Ivo Sanader:
There's no such statesman-traitor in the world...
IA
17 Oct 2007
No statesman in the world would have ever sent his highest-ranking soldiers to the prison on demand of an international tribunal and then state that he is “pleased that the tribunal appreciates its cooperation…”
No statesman in the world would take pride in the fact that his country “established” an international tribunal which tries its liberation military operations (Storm) for a “joint criminal enterprise” and “war crimes,” and furthermore, state that the “Tribunal’s mandate and mission have been achieved,” that “the peace has been restored and confidence is growing” – and especially not when the peace was achieved by the very operation (Storm) his tribunal put on its trial bench…
No statesman in the world would have ever find in it a “precious lesson,” especially not at the moment when the only lesson learned in that Tribunal is that there is no justice. His tribunal – the ICTY - couldn’t even punish the worst Yugoslav Army and Serbian Chetnik butchers in Vukovar.
If Vukovar – a symbol of Croatian suffering – received such “justice” – what "mercy" can we expect for the winning Operation Storm that ended all such sufferings in both Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, and permanently defeated the aggressor?
No statesman in the world would still promise a “full support” for an international tribunal that wronged his country as badly as the ICTY wronged Croatia, and thus block every action by other countries against its injustices by promoting it as “vehicle for justice and for asserting the values of humanity.” The only “value” his tribunal asserted is the occupation, murder and destruction of Croatia and its people.
Thus, the only concrete “value” that Ivo Sanader’s “vehicle for justice” (ICTY) accomplished” is a false indictment against Croatia and its liberators, General Gotovina in particular, who ended Milosevic’s, Karadžić’s, Mladic’s, and other butchers’ wars. The guilt was individualized only for Serbian war criminals, and so few of them, while Croatia is on trial for “joint criminal enterprise” of ending their occupation.
No statesman in the world would fail to bring up the issue of false accusations against the brightest and cleanest military operations that ended the horrible war (Storm, of course!), and its most honorable commanders, and even claim that the justice would be “fully served” by "extraction" of a only few Serbian war criminals ("Karadžic and Mladic as well as Goran Hadžic"), and only for “war crimes committed in Vukovar and Eastern Slavonia.”
Such Sanader's "fully served justice" does't serve justice at all.
No statesman in the world would prosecute, or let be prosecuted, its countries highest-ranking officials who defended not only parts of the country but most of the country that was under 4-year occupation by the 3rd or 4th largest military force in Europe (Yugoslav Army and Serbian paramilitary units), even if an international tribunal demands so. The justice would be fully served only when the innocent Croatian liberators, wrongly accused by the ICTY, would be liberated.
Indeed, there’s no such statesman in the world.
But, there’s such "statesman" in Croatia, whose words from his speech at the UN General Assembly I just quoted above. His name is Ivo Sanader. Asking justice after all his praise for the tribunal that he endorsed, once again, upon Croatia, defies all justice. Nothing obliges the ICTY to serve justice for Croatia, given that its prime minister is so full of gratitude to it!
Indeed, there’s no such traitor in the world who would be so “decisive” to save a Tribunal but not his country's innocent, wrongly accused, generals whom he seeks to ruin. Ivo Sanader is indeed the only such statesman in the world. That’s the only lesson learned from his speech before the UN General Assembly, and that there will be no justice soon for Croatia.
Hence, wonder not that Ivo Sanader opened his speech by acknowledging the President of the ICTY, H.E. Judge Fausto Pocar, even though the latter, just a few days before Sanader’s speech, had tried, via an unofficial document, silence every criticism against the ICTY (Vukovar case). But Ivo Sander is “pleased” with him from the outset.
"We spoke about further cooperation between Croatia and the ICTY, but I cannot tell you more about it at this time,” states for the journalists Ivo Sanader at his official vlada.hr website. But he told us everything.
Croatia can be confident that its prime minister has blatantly betrayed it, once more.
If president Mesic let his prime minister go and give this speech instead of him (about which they initially had an argument), Sanader couldn’t have disheartened him.
After all this, what can we expect from the UN's Mr.President, Distinguished Representatives, and excellencies. Nothing. No justice.
|
Nema takva državnika - izdajice svoje države u svijetu
IA
17. listopada 2007.
Nema takva državnika u svijetu koji bi poslao svoje vojnike najvišeg ranga u zatvore na zahtjev nekog međunarodnog suda i onda izrazio “zadovoljstvo što Sud cijeni suradnju…”
Nema takva državnika u svijetu koji bi se ponosio što mu je država “jedna od država koje su predložile osnivanje” međunarodnog suda koji sudi njezinim osloboditeljskim vojnim operacijama za “združeni zločinački pothvat” i “ratne zločine,” i još naveo da su “ciljevi iz mandata Suda i njegove misije postignuti,” te da je “mir ponovno uspostavljen, a povjerenje raste” – pogotovo ne kad je mir postignut istom tom operacijom (Oluja) što se nalazi na optuženičkom stolu tog suda.
Nema takva državnika u svijetu koji bi u tome našao “dragocjene pouke za budućnost,” pogotovo ne u trenutku kad jedina pouka tog suda je ta da pravde nema. Njegov sud – MKS – nije mogao kazniti ni najstrašnije zločine koljača Jugoslavenske armije i četnika u Vukovaru.
Ako je Vukovar – simbol hrvatske patnje – dobio takvu “pravdu” – kakvu “milost” treba čekati za pobjedničku operaciju Oluja koja je zaustavila takve patnje i u Hrvatskoj i u Bosni i Hercegovini, trajno porazivši agresora?
Nema takva državnika u svijetu koji bi i dalje obećavao “punu suradnju” nekom međunarodnom sudu koji je tako teško okrivio njegovu zemlju kao što je MKS Hrvatsku, i time spriječio svaki potez drugih zemalja protiv njegovih nepravdi, pa taj sud još promovirao kao “sredstvo za postizanje pravde, braneći vrijednosti čovječanstva." Jedina “vrijednost” koju je taj sud obranio je okupacija, ubijanje i razaranje Hrvatske i njezina naroda.
Stoga, jedina konkretna “vrijednost” što je “sredstvo za postizanje pravde” (MKS) Ive Sanadera donijelo Hrvatskoj lažne su optužnice protiv Hrvatske i njezinih osloboditelja, a napose generala Gotovine, koji su zaustavili ratove Miloševića, Karadžića, Mladića i drugih koljača. Krivnja je pojedinačna samo za Srbiju, za tako mali broj zločinaca, dok je Hrvatska na sudu za “združeni zločinački pothvat” okončanja njihove okupacije.
Nema takva državnika u svijetu koji bi propustio priliku iznijeti lažne optužbe protiv najsjajnijih i najčasnijih vojnih operacija koje su zaustavile užasni rat (Oluja, naravno!), i protiv njihovih najčasnijih zapovjednika, pa još rekao da bi “pravda bila u potpunosti zadovoljena” tek izručenjem samo nekih srpskih ratnih zločinaca “Karadžića i Mladića, te Gorana Hadžića,” te samo za “za ratni zločin počinjen u Vukovaru i Istočnoj Slavoniji.”
Takva “posve zadovoljena pravda” Ive Sanadera ne služi upravo nikakvoj pravdi.
Nema takva državnika u svijetu koji bi progonio, ili dao progoniti svoje najviše vojne dužnosnike koji su obranili ne samo dio zemlje nego većinu zemlje koja je bila pod 4-godišnjom okupacijom 3. ili 4. najveće vojne sile u Europi (JNA i srpske paravojne, četničke postrojbe) čak da to traži i neki međunarodni sud. Pravda bi bila “u potpunosti zadovoljena” samo onda kad bi se nevini hrvatski osloboditelji, lažno optuženi od MKS-a, oslobodili. Uistinu, nema takva državnika u svijetu.
Ali takva “državnika” ima Hrvatska, čije su riječi gore citirane, pod znakom navodnika, iz njegova govora pred općom skupštinom UN-a. Ime mu je Ivo Sanader. Traženje pravde nakon sve slave koju je premijer uputio tribunalu, čime je nepravde tog tribunala, opet, ozakonio nad Hrvatskom, naprosto ubija svaku pravdu. Nakon toga, više ništa ne obvezuje MKS da osigura pravdu Hrvatskoj, jer premijer Hrvatske je tako pun zahvalnosti tom sudu.
Uistinu nema takva izdajice u svijetu koji bi bio toliko odlučan u spašavanju Suda radije nego svojih nevinih, lažno optuženih generala koje gleda uništiti. Ivo Sanader je upravo jedini takav državnik u svijetu. To je jedina “pouka” koju smo naučili iz njegova govora pred općom skupštinom UN-a, te da za Hrvatsku tu ne će uskoro biti pravde.
Dakle, ne treba čuditi što je Ivo Sanader otvorio svoj govor priznanjem Predsjedniku Medjunarodnog kaznenog suda za bivšu Jugoslaviju, Nj.E. sucu Fausta Pocara, premda je potonji, samo par dana prije tog govora, pokušao putem neslužbenog dokumenta utišati svaku kritiku protiv MKS-a (slučaj Vukovar). Ivo Sanader je čak izrazio "zadovoljstvo" njime već na samom početku.
"Razgovarali smo i o daljnjoj suradnji između Hrvatske i ICTY-a, ali više od toga ne mogu u ovom trenutku reći," stoji izjava Ive Sanadera za novinare na službenim stranicama vlade. Međutim, sve nam je rekao.
Hrvatska može imati povjerenje da je njezin premijer pokvareno izdao, još jedanput.
Ako je predsjednik Mesić dopustio premijeru ići održati govor mjesto njega (oko čega su isprva imali nesporazume), Sanader ga ipak nije mogao razočarati.
Nakon svega toga, što očekivati od gospodina predsjednika, cijenjenih predstavnika, i ekscelencija pri UN-u. Ništa. Nema pravde. Objavljeno na www.hrvatskauljudba.hr
|
||
|
Licence to murder, Licence to betray IA 29.9. 2007 The Hague’s judgment in favour of Serbian Chetnik-Yugoslav [People’s] Army war criminals in Croatian Vukovar means yet another war crime upon Croatia, and a cruel massacre against the truth and justice. Yugoslav People's Army [JNA] was found not guilty for murder, torture, and cruel treatment of civilians, elderly and children in distroyed Vukovar, for: "Despite the contrary evidence of some Croat witnesses, there were also members of the Croatian forces, pretending to be patients or hospital staff. " Hence, according to the Hague's tribunal, there were neither wounded Croatian soldiers in the hospital of the city that was under 87-day siege by the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) and various Serbian paramilitary units!? They were all to be murdered, anyhow. Unbeliavable. After fall of Vukovar, the [Croatian!] people in the hospital were seperated "into two groups, war crimes suspects and civilians. " The judgment states that the victims were "the war crimes suspects, i.e the members of the Croatian forces." Thus JNA was cleared of every guilt. Thus JNA were allowed to believe whatever they wish and attack Croatia, distroy it, torture and murder its army, the wounded taken from the hospital, civilians, elderly, women and children. All that was legal, especially because Croatia had Croatian soldiers who were defending themselves! In this consists the key problem with the Hague's tribunal from its inception: Croatia wasn't supposed to have armed forces, nor defend itself. Whilst, JNA might have "suspected" or "believed" anything so to obtain the licence to murder, same as nowdays in The Hague. Hadn't JNA believed in the idea of Greater Serbia, too, when it put itself in its service via constitutional change in Belgrade, Serbia!? Hadn't Serbian chetniks and JNA painted all Croatians into "ustashi" so to justify their crimes upon Croatia!? Not to mention what they have "suspected" about "ustashe"! Suddenly, the tribunal in the Hague can deal only with war crimes involving civilian victims. Suddenly, the tribunal acts strictly "by law"! Have we forgetten that it acted against Croatian jorunalists as well!? If criteria by which JNA was justified for the war crime upon Vukovar were applied to Croatia, no Croatian soldier would have ever be indicted. Croatians believed to have at least the right to defense from the enemy who had often attacked in civilian attire, or used civilians in the battles. What else was to be expected from The Hague's tribunal, but yet another green light for aggression against Croatia. The fact that Vukovar, known as a hero-city, has been distroyed once more, in The Hague, is not pleasant neither for those who imprisoned and betrayed most honorable Croatian heroes. Croatian best soldiers. Sanader, Mesić, and similar promoters of their own, "clear", "unambigouous", "unconditional", "full" support with the tribunal in The Hague are changing colours now. They pretend to be "disappointed" or "surprised" by the injustice of The Hague's tribunal towards Vukovar's victims. As if there were no injustices in every indictment against Croatia so far. However, as Serbian chetniks and JNA have obtained the licence to murder, in 1991 and today, with a new stamp from The Hague, Croatian prime minister Ivo Sanader seeks the licence to betray, as he did by now, and would still do in the future. Therefore, Sanader still insists that his own murky politics towards the tribunal in The Hague "wasn't wrong" because "the late president Tudjman instisted that it [cooperation with The Hague's tribunal] be not an ordinary law but a constitutional one." (JL, 28 Sept 2007) Sanader is truly stubborn, given that Tudjman had never unconditionally cooperated with The Hague like Sanader did. It's another – diplomatic – story, isn't it, as for who insisted on "constitutional law" here... Sanader has forgotten that he sabotaged the change of the constitutional law on cooperation with The Hague's tribunal, as soon as he came in power, although it was to be finally crystal clear where such laws lead Croatia, even to those who didn't see it before. Anyhow, in Tudjman's era, we might have consoled ourselves that they didn't know what they were doing, but not today, after all injustices and scandals in The Hague's tribunal. Hence, what to do with the enemies who know what they're doing, how to forgive them. So, neither JNA, nor Serbian chetniks, nor Ivo Sanader, not to mention The Hague's prosecutors, were wrong. Fantastico! For Vukovar, IA
|
VUKOVAR: Dozvola za ubijanje, Dozvola za izdaju. IA 29.9. 2007. Haaška presuda u korist srbo-jugoslavenskih zločinaca (četnika i J(N)A) nad Vukovarom još je jedan zločin nad Hrvatima i masakr nad istinom i pravdom. "JNA je u vukovarskoj bolnici posebno izdvajala ljude za koje je znala ili je vjerovala da pripadaju hrvatskim snagama," pa je zato neprijateljska zločinačka vojska oslobođena krivnje. Sudeći po haaškoj presudi, nije bilo ni ranjenih hrvatskih vojnika u bolnici u gradu koji se našao napadnut, pod opsadom JNA i četničkih pravojnij postrojbi skoro 3 mjeseca! U svakom slučaju ih je trebalo sve pobiti!? Nevjerojatno. JNA je imala pravo vjerovati što je htjela i napasti Hrvatsku, razarati, mučiti i ubijati joj vojsku, ranjenike iz bolnice, civile, starce, žene i djecu. Sve je to bilo legalno, pogotovo ako Hrvatska ima vojsku! Žrtve jugo-četničke agresije na Vukovar jasno su u presudi haaškog suda nazvane "osumnjičenim za ratne zločine" - jer su se zatekli u napadnutom Vukovaru, branili ga. U tome je cijeli problem s Haagom otpočetka! Hrvatska nije smjela imati vojsku, niti braniti se. A JNA je mogla "vjerovati" što je htjela i dobiti dozvolu za ubijanje, kao danas u Haagu. Zar JNA nije vjerovala i u veliku Srbiju kojoj se po jugoslavenskom ustavu stavila u funkciju? Zar nisu četnicima i JNA svi Hrvati bili "ustaše"? A što tek oni "vjeruju" da su bile "ustaše"! Sad se haaški sud može baviti samo ratnim zločinima, gdje su žrtve civili. Što je haaško tužiteljstvo odjedanput "striktno" i "zakonito"! Zaboravili su da se bavili i hrvatskim novinarima!? Da kriterij po kojem je J(N)A "oprana" od strašnih ratnih zločina nad Vukovarom vrijedi u Hrvatskoj, ne bi nijedan hrvatski vojnik nikad bio osudjen. Povjerovali smo da imamo barem toliko prava obraniti od neprijatelja, koji je često napadao i u civilkama, ili koristio civile u borbama. Što je drugo bilo za očekivati od Haaga nego još jedno zeleno svjetlo agresiji nad Hrvatskom. To što je sad i grad-heroj – Vukovar – još jedanput srušen u Haagu, nije ugodno ni onima što su pozatvarali i izdali najčasnije hrvatske heroje. Hrvatske najbolje vojnike, branitelje. Kao semafor se mijenjaju Sanader i Mesić i slični zagovaratelji neke njihove vlastite, "jasne", "nedvosmislene", "bezuvjetne", "pune" suradnje s tribunalom u Haagu. Glume neko "razočarnje" ili "iznenađenje" zbog nepravde haaškog tužiteljstva prema vukovarskim žrtvama. Kao da nije bilo nepravdi dosada u svakoj optužnici protiv Hrvatske. Međutim, kao što su četnici i JNA našli dozvolu za ubijanje, 1991., s novim pečatom danas u Haagu, hrvatski premijer Ivo Sanader sebi nalazi dozvolu za izdaju, kako do sada tako i ubuduće. Naime, Sanader i dalje tvrdi da njegova vlastita mutna politika prema Haaškom sudu "nije bila pogrešna" jer "pokojni predsjednik Tuđman inzistirao je da to ne bude običan zakon nego upravo ustavni zakon." (JL, 28.9.2007.) Uporan je Sanader, premda Tuđman nikad nije baš bezuvjetno surađivao s Haagom kao Sanader, a tko je htio "upravo ustavni zakon" posebna je, diplomatska priča, zar ne. Zaboravio Sanader kako je sabotirao izmjenu ustavnog zakona o suradnji s Haagom čim je došao na čelo HDZ-a, kad je konačno bilo jasno kuda to vodi, ako komu nije bilo prije. Na kraju, u Tuđmanovo smo se vrijeme nekako i mogli tješiti da ne znaju što čine, ali danas baš i ne, nakon svih haaških nepravdi i skandala. Što dakle učiniti s neprijateljem koji zna što čini, kako njemu oprostiti? Dakle, ni JNA, ni četnici, ni Ivo Sanader nisu pogriješili, a da ne spominjemo Haag. Krasno. Za Vukovar, IA
|
||
|
Diana Majhen (Croatia) 28 Sept 2007 By the judgment for [Serbian war criminals] Mrksic, Sljivancanin and Radic, the tribunal in The Hague only confirmed what most of us has known so well, and our governments didn’t want to admit: There’s no justice in The Hague for Croatian victims. There was never there, and there will never be there justice. As for trials against us, we should have never allowed to be judged by the foreign court regardless of the consequences. We became the only winning army in the history whose winning generals, and not only the generals, stand trial. But, it wouldn’t be correct to put all blame on The Hague’s tribunal [ICTY]. They only do their dirty work, which is exclusively politically motivated. We must ask ourselves, how it could have happened that such weak indictment was raised [against the Serbian war criminals and Yugoslav army]. How it could have happened that there was space for such [not guilty] judgment? Such judgment, including the justification by the judge who brought it, tells us that the involvement of our government was negligible, if any. But, if we think a little, it’s only a step in a sequence. The primary goal of the Croatian government was to join the EU, regardless of the price. So they don’t care about Croatian victims such as those at Ovcara, or about people who fought for this country who now stand trials, and are in prisons. Europe wants us only in the package with Serbia. We don’t need to be called Yugoslavia, it’s why there’s CEFTA and similar names. But it’s important that this region be peaceful, that we forget the war, and that we daily kiss each other three times if at all possible,. For this reason, the guilt must be equalized as soon as possible. In order to come to this, even Croatian forces should be proclaimed as “paramilitary” along with the Serbian ones. On the other hand, the Yugoslav People’s Army [JNA] should be seen as the only legal military force that was doing the right thing. We must ignore the fact that it’s the same Yugoslav People’s army that joined [Serbian] cetnik [paramilitary] units in murdering and destroying Croatia [namely, persecutions, extermination, murder, torture and inhumane acts against Croatia.] Hence, neither The Hague nor Croatia, wants to deal with [the war crimes of] the YNA and its top commanders. Occasionally, they only touch upon some of them, so to disguise their bias. Unless they receive them with red carpet, as in Stojanovski case. In any event, they remain untouchable at the end. What does prevent Croatia from filing indictments, independent of The Hague, against the butchers in the [Yugoslav] uniform with theb[red] five-pointed star [a symbol of communism]? We can say that The Hague’s tribunal doesn’t care, that it doesn’t want to bother itself with it, or that it’s not in its interest that it happens at all. But, what to say for our top state leaders? Exactly the same. Not even Savo Strbac would have anything to approach them. Finally, who does still need him? Compared to our government, Savo Strbac is only a clumsy amateur. Diana Majhen [The notes in the brackets inserted by the translator @ VoC’s Democracy blog]
|
Zaboravljene žrtve Diana Majhen 28. 9. 2007. Svojom posljednjom presudom Mrkšiću, Šljivančaninu i Radiću Haaški je sud samo potvrdio ono što većina nas jako dobro zna, a naše vlade nikada nisu htjele priznati. U Haagu za Hrvate pravde nema. Nije je nikada bilo, niti će je ikada biti. Neovisno o tome kakve posljedice bile, nikada nismo smjeli dopustiti da nam tudjini sude. Time smo svakako ušli u povijest kao jedina pobjednička vojska čijim se generalima, i ne samo generalima, sudi. No, ne bi bilo u redu bacati svu krivnju na Haag. On samo odradjuje svoj prljavi posao, koji je isključivo politički motiviran. Trebamo se upitati, kako se uopće moglo dogoditi da postoji ovakva optužnica? Kako se moglo dogoditi da se ostavi slobodan prostor za ovake presude? Ova presuda, uključujući i obrazloženje suca koji ju je donio, govori nam da je angažiranje naše Vlade po tom pitanju bilo minimalno ili nikakvo. No, ako se samo malo zamislimo, sve savršeno pada na svoje mjesto. Primarni cilj hrvatske vlade je ući u EU što prije, ne pitajući za cijenu.
I pri tome su
joj potpuno nebitne hrvatske žrtve poput onih sa Ovčare, potpuno nebitni
ljudi koji su se borili za ovu zemlju, a sada im se sudi i zatvara ih se.
Zato se što prije mora izjednačiti krivnja, a za tako nešto, potrebno je paravojnim jedinicama proglasiti i hrvatsku, a ne samo srpsku vojsku. Dok, s druge strane, JNA ostaje kao jedina legitimna vojna sila, koja je, izgleda, postupala ispravno. To što je ta ista JNA ubijala i palila po Hrvatskoj ruku pod ruku sa četničkim postrojbama, mora se zanemariti. Pa tako Hrvatska, jednako kao i Haag, ne dira JNA i njene glavešine. Tek tu i tamo, reda radi, ponekog izdvoje, da im se ne bi mogla prebaciti pristranost. Ukoliko ga se ne dočeka sa crvenim tepihom poput Stojanovskog. No, u konačnici, oni ostaju nedodirljivi. Jer, što priječi Hrvatsku da sama, neovisno o Haagu, pogura optužnice protiv koljača u uniformama sa petokrakom? Možemo reći da Haagu nije stalo, da se ne želi time zamarati, da mu ne paše da se to uopće dogodi. Ali što reći za naš državni vrh? Izgleda, isto to. I to se radi tako dobro, da čak i Savo Štrbac ne bi imao što prigovoriti. U konačnici, kome je on više uopće i potreban? Prema mnogima u našoj Vladi, Savo Štrbac je tek nespretni amater. Diana Majhen
|
||
|
Warning: Sanader's HDZ (Sanader and HDZ as they really are - Con'd) IA
4 Sep 2007
Due to extensive abuse of my email address via web sites that are enabling sending the messages and articles in the name of someone else – please be careful with all such messages coming under my name. My positions are clearly stated at VoC and what I (don't) support. Most people who know how HDZ does it won't get confused.
However, I will use this opportunity, too, to remind us of maniac-traitor style governance in Croatia. As usual, I don't intend do deal with Sanader's maniacs but with his way of governance.
The elections in Croatia are carefully queued from hand to hand among the old communist "elites" and their servants. If they don't share their communist past they share at least old communist secret service links, so to never account for the crimes against Croatians.
Then what the maniacs in electoral campaigns and such mandates are for?
Apart from their mad feasts, they're there to make sure they "teach us the lesson" so that we learn we cannot deal with their dirty tactics. At least that's what Ivo Sanader's trustee Ivica Ban "Orsat" tried to "teach me," together with some others.
Thus some communist "secret" services' dirty tactics are coming out thanks to PM Sanader. We should "learn" that Croatian Homeland war soldiers and officers are "war criminals" and Ivo Sanader is the idol of all idols.
What we won't write or do, the enemy of Croatia and incompetent leaders will write and do in our name. To put it in their own words, they'll do "everything in their power" so that they are not "destabilized" in their organized crimes against their own people, preserve their positions, and force everyone to kneel before them. It's how they practice "democracy."
And obviously they do things in our names so to accomplish their hostile agenda towards those who recognize their criminal activities against Croatian Homeland war in particular.
It is sad that Croatia haven't produced honest political class since its independence – and did sideline and make suffer all those who haven’t shared some past ideology with them or the wealth they took away in dishonest way from Croatian veterans and people – which is also why they're mad at every idea of losing power and facing law and justice.
Croatian war for independence wasn't ideological, and yet the political class preserved all ideological (communist) criteria to block the access to politics to all those who defended the country under the most horrific war circumstances.
Hence, what's HDZ's excuse for all their national treasons and dirty tactics against opposition, and for their unnumerable failures? "Democracy"??
Tell us about economics and your confortable lives... or how your treasons took us away almost our daily bread.
So, go on Ivica Ban Orsat, FB et al., you made your PM Ivo Sanader and yourself so famous. You deserved a mention on my democracy blog. Thanks.
(but, obviously, not my addresses, my name or the name of anyone who opposes PM.)
|
Upozorenje: Sanaderov HDZ (Kako to rade Sanader i HDZ - nastavak) IA 4. rujna 2007 Zbog pojačane zlouporabe moje email adrese preko portala koji omogućuju slanje poruka i članaka u ime nekoga drugoga – molim sve za oprez s takvim porukama koje dolaze pod mojim imenom. Moje pozicije stoje jasno na VoC-u i ono što ja (ne) zastupam. Većinu osoba koje znaju kako to radi HDZ neće ništa zbuniti. Ali svakako ću iskoristiti i ovu situaciju da se podsjetimo na manijačko-izdajnički stil vladavine u Hrvatskoj. Kao i obično, ne kanim imati posla sa Sanaderovim manijacima, nego njegovim stilom vladanja. Izbori se u Hrvatskoj oprezno prenose iz ruke u ruku među starim komunističkim "elitama" i njihovim poslušnicima. Ako ne dijele komunističku prošlost, dijele stare veze u tajnim komunističkim službama, tako da nitko ne odgovara za počinjene zločine i nepravde prema Hrvatima. Čemu onda služe manijaci u njihovim izbornim kampanjama i tijekom cijelog mandata? Osim luđačkog zabavljanja, oni su tu da nas "nauče pameti" tako da uvidimo da se ne možemo nositi s njihovom prljavom taktikom. Barem je mene Sanaderov "tajni" povjerenik Ivica Ban "Orsat" tako tome stalno pokušavao naučiti - "pameti," skupa s nekim drugima. Tako kosovsko-udbaška nečista taktika izlazi na vidjelo zahvaljujući pemijeru Sanaderu. Trebali bismo naučiti da su vojnici i časnici Domovinskog rata "ratni zločinci" a Ivo Sanader idol svih idola. Što mi nećemo pisati ili činiti, neprijatelji Hrvatske i nesposobni čelnici mogu u naše ime. Njihovim riječima, učinit će "sve što je u njihovoj moći" da ih se ne destabilizira u organiziranom kriminalu protiv vlastitog naroda, da sačuvaju pozicije, i svakog stave na koljena pred njih. Tako oni prakticiraju "demokraciju." I očito rade stvari u naše ime kako bi ostvarili svoj nečasni plan prema svima koji prepoznaju njihove kriminalne aktivnosti napose protiv hrvatskog Domovinskog rata. Žalosno je da Hrvatska nije proizvela poštenu političku klasu još od svoje neovisnosti - a marginalizirala sve one koji s njima ne dijele neku staru ideologiju ili sve što su uzeli na nepošten način od branitelja i naroda- zbog čega također luduju na svaku ideju o gubitku vlasti i suočavanju s pravdom i zakonom. Hrvatski rat za neovisnost nije bio ideološki, ali svejedno su ideološki (komunistički) kriteriji prevagnuli u političkoj klasi kako bi se blokirao svaki pristup politici od strane onih što su branili domovinu pod najstrašnijim ratnim okolnostima. Dakle, što je HDZ-ova isprika za nacionalnu izdaju i prljavu taktiku protiv neistomišljenika, ili za njihove nebrojene gafove? "Demokracija"? Pričajte nam o gospodastvu i vašim komfornim životima.... ili kako su nam vaše izdaje zamalo uzele i kruh svagdanji iz usta. Tako, nastavite Ivica Bane Orsate, FB et al., proslavili ste vašeg premijera Ivu Sanadera, a i sebe s njim. Zaslužili ste spomen na mom blogu o demokraciji. Hvala. (ali ne i moje adrese, moje ime, i ime svih onih koji se ozbiljno usprotive politici premijera.) Do sljedećeg komentara o prošlostima, već kad bude potreba za to..., VoC predlaže da posjetite stranice gdje je prenesno niz zanimljivih reakcija i ozbiljnih argumenata na podmećanja i neistine o prošlosti Generala Gotovini:
Još jedanput, ponosni smo na hrvatske vojnike i Domovinski rat! Pogotovo one s uistinu časnom francuskom prošlosti! Hvala za Oluju!
|
||
|
Diana Majhen (Croatia): Sanader and HDZ as they really are 28 Aug 2007 Reading IA's article entitled "General Gotovina's past "dark" for being French and not communist one" gave me a bad déjŕ vu feeling.
My husband and I were experiencing all that Ivana is writing about while we were running the website "NEM@CENZURE." (No censorship).
Of course, same as Ivana's, our writing condemned Sanader and his government. We qualified it not just once as the traitor one, for a simple reason we see it as such. As we found it important (and we still do) that the people be reminded of the way Sanader came in power, we often run his speech at the rally in Split so to compare what he promised with what he did and still does.
We went even further. We looked for all those uncomfortable news about HDZ, which were either never published, or hidden at the bottom of the last pages of some media source with little chance that anyone will ever notice it. We published such news on the website, because we thought that the people had right to know it, even if the Government and the corrupted media would like to deprive it of that right.
As our readership was growing, our work started to be obstructed. We were called home, threatened via cell phone and mail, were constantly reminded that we weren't "untouchable" as they often said. Several times, they wrote in our name what we'd never write, and also HDZ's No 1 man from the USA was promising to visit us with his friends.
And what a coincidence, we, too, had an incessant problem with the person that used the nickname Orsat, who tried to imply that we worked for the Serbs, given that he failed to explain us that we should be writing in glory and praise of HDZ and Sanader.
It's actually tragic-comic, because who else would glorify Sanader more than the Serbs. There's no one in Croatia who would give to Serbia and its standard-bearers more than Sanader gave them, including their actual power-sharing. If the names corresponded to the deeds, HDZ would be renamed into Serbo-Croat Democratic Union with the arrival of Sanader on its head.
Why am I writing all this?
First, I would like to inform the public what happens to the people who write against HDZ and Sanader.
I would also like to give a support to IA and tell her not to pay attention to those who persistently try to stop her work.
They only do their dirty job, trying to convince us that it's all fine that our generals are in The Hague's or Croatia's prisons, that our soldiers of the Homeland war are increasingly committing suicides because they are every a while falsely accused of war crimes, that the victim and the aggressors are equalized, until a majority of people is brainwashed enough so to not oppose a new Balkan integration.
There have always been the treasons and it will be so.
It's theirs to try and ours to persevere.
Diana Majhen
My most sincere thanks to Diana from Croatia, and all others who have condemned HDZ/Sanader's practice, and encouraged me to continue running my website. Ivana/VoC.
|
Diana Majhen
(Hrvatska):
Kako to rade Sanader i HDZ 28. kolovoza 2007. Čitajući članak Ivane Arapović pod nazivom “Prošlost generala Gotovine mračna jer je francuska, a ne komunistička”, javio mi se opaki déjŕ vu.
Sve ovo o čemu Ivana piše, prošli smo moj suprug i ja u vrijeme dok smo držali portal “NEM@CENZURE”.
Tražili smo sve one, za HDZ nepovoljne vijesti, koje ili nisu nikada bile objavljene, ili su našle neko skrovito, na dnu predzadnje stranice nekog medija mjesto, sa jako malom šansom da će ih ljudi pročitati. Takve smo vijesti objavljivali na portalu, jer smo bili mišljenja da narod ima pravo znati, čak i onda kada mu Vlada i korumpirani mediji to pravo uskraćuju. Kako se portal razvijao, tako su i drugi ljudi takodjer pisali članke koje smo mi objavljivali. Zato, što im to nitko drugi nije htio objaviti.
Nazivali su nas doma, prijetili putem mobitela i mailova, stalno nas podsjećali da nismo, kako su se više puta izrazili “nedodirljivi”. Takodjer su više puta pisali u naše ime ono što mi nikada ne bi napisali, takodjer nam je bivši prvi HDZ-ov čovjek iz SAD-a obećavao kako će nas posjetiti sa svojim prijateljima. I, gle koncidencije, takodjer smo imali stalnih problema sa likom pod nadimkom Orsat, koji nas je pokušao proglasiti srpskim plaćenicima, kada nam već nije uspio objasniti da se treba pisati u slavu i hvalu HDZ-a i Sanadera.
Ne postoji nitko tko bi Srbiji i njenim stjegonošama u Hrvatskoj dao više od našeg premijera, uračunavajući tu i podijelu vlasti. Kada bi se imena dodijeljivala prema zaslugama, HDZ bi sa dolaskom Sanadera na vlast promjenio ime u Srpskohrvatska Demokratska zajednica.
Htjela bih, kao prvo, upoznati javnost sa tim što se dogadja ljudima koji pišu protiv HDZ-a i Sanadera.
A takodjer, htjela bih dati podršku Ivani Arapović i poručiti joj da se ne obazire na one koji uporno pokušavaju stopirati njen rad.
Kako je potpuno u redu neprekidno izjednačavati žrtvu i agresora, sve dok se većini ne ispere mozak dovoljno da ne budu protiv novih balkanskih integracija.
Njihovo je da pokušaju, a naše da nikada ne popustimo.
Diana Majhen
Najiskrenije zahvaljujem Diani iz Hrvatske, i svim drugima koji su osudili HDZ-ovu/Sanaderovu praksu i podržali me da nastavim raditi na VoC-u. Ivana.
|
||
|
"Politicians of the year" and "humanists"!?
The ICTY's and media/political verdict against Gen Gotovina:
General Gotovina's past "dark" for being French and not communist one
26 Aug 2007
Besides, on 23 Aug, I received a "discrete" warning from the key HDZ USA man who enjoys Mr Sanader's full support. He sends a caution "to me alone" saying that I do damage by my writing “not to HDZ, worry not, but to yourself, Ante and others.” Whoever replies to the lies and forgeries against Croatian Homeland war volunteers, and reveals their source (Croatian government) – it will cost only “me, Ante [Gen Ante Gotovina] and other” volunteers. As if there were no damage caused to anyone by the false indictment against operation Storm and its commanders. HDZ is hollow and unscrupulous. In other words, let's admit that we're all criminals, the hero of the Homeland war in particular, and that Mr Sanader is the idol of all idols, otherwise, we'll pay the price. What can be still worse? It's how the communists, Stalinists and Titoists, were exhorting high guilty plea rates and imposing dead silence over uncountable destroyed lives. But we're dealing with the democrats, aren't we? HDZ means Croatian democratic union. Well not quite so... And, this wasn't the first time that HDZ threatens me with causing damage to whomever and whatever I show respect to. Indeed, many of my former Croatian friends no longer dare to communicate with me because of the threats from Sanader's HDZ. First I must remind HDZ (although they know) that I’m not part of the General's defence team, and I’m publishing my own analysis and findings independent from any lobbyist or political party. It's about Carla Del Ponte's current rejection of General's defence team request that he await the trial in home custody, en effet, in any Croatian home, which would give him a better opportunity to prepare for the trial against him and Croatia's Operation Storm. All other indictees have been granted this right under much looser conditions than those requested by General Gotovina's defense team. Carla Del Ponte rejected the defence team's request mostly because of General's "dark" French past, for which she has no single witness who'd face the defence team on this issue. By the way, this has nothing to do with the General's indictment for Operation Storm, and such accussations have been proven false since a long time, as well as all others that were meant to destroy the General's image among his people and thus every support for him. But we shall not discuss here the ICTY's "regularities" all over again! However, it's no longer clear, especially after prosecution and imprisonment of Croatian anti-communist journalists in The Hague, what's a real agenda of the ICTY and Croatia's government. Why one's "French past" (say, in French foreign legion) is "dark" in advance, and the communist one is not, althought precisely the communists more than anyone else (yes, along with Nazis and fascists) painted the 20th century into the bloodiest one in the history of civilization!? Here HDZ fulfils their latest threat and commences a dirty campaign in the name of HDZ's "politician of the year" (Sanader) and "humanist of the 20th century (Mesić) about which I had an "honour" to be warned in advance by Sanader's No 1 man in the US. Let's go back to the chronology of these events. On 22 Aug, I received a provocative email by "Orsat" precisely about General Gotovina's "French past" and other forgeries against him. From my past experience with HDZ, I knew instinctively and instantly, that such material accompanied PM Sanader's "warranty" given in support to the home custody request for General Gotovina while awaiting his trial. It incited me to finally publish an open inquiry, even to Croatia's Bishops, which tormented me for days: Who's Ivo Sanader, political delinquent or idol, and in what does consist his supposed "Catholicism," "intellectual superiority," "Europeism" and so on and on. Before Croatian public learned Carla Del Ponte's decision and the reasons behind her rejection of the General's defense request for home custody, that is, 2 days in advance, "Ivica Ban Orsat" had sent me the "dossier" on the General's "dark past" in its pre-publication format! ("Normally" he's tasked with maniac-style campaigns for Sanader and Mesić for about 5 years already, esp. against my humble self, whose plain idiotism was often distributed via HDZ USA network.) This is the origin of the Croatian general's "dark past" that was later spread even by some foreign media! This is also my reply to a friendly inquiry: "Why do you pay any attention to the idiots, weak characters, liars and maniacs such as orsat." "Orsat" as well as the words from this message from Croatia justly represent the reality of duplicitous communist-secret-service style politics of the Government of Croatia and Sanader's HDZ towards Croatian most honourable soldiers and officers. On 23 Aug, HDZ "discretely" warns me that my response will cost Gen Ante Gotovina.... and already on 24 Aug "Slobodna Dalmacija," whose editor in chief shares with PM Sanader's their common communist past (porno-correspondents for Serbia's Belgrade "Start" and communist secret services), and is also PM Sanader's trusted comagnion at his recent visit to the US, runs the title "They don't trust Gotovina because of his dark past." Anonymous author who hides his past but also his current coordinates doesn't bring a single argument from General's defense team side - the other side of the story has no voice in "Slobodna..." According to that "journalist" and Carla Del Ponte, Croatian general (the very same one) was fighting Croatian liberation war in Croatia and committing crimes on France's soil even in the 1990s! There's no mention at all of the defense statement that "the French government was maintaining high-level military contacts with Gotovina between 1992 and 2001 and was issuing him French passports." Under normal circumstances, no one would be paying attention to the headlines of "Slobodna Dalmacija," but for such and similar insinuations and "logic" General Gotovina has spent about 20 months in the ICTY's prison, although innocent, while it's "not a too long time" neither for Croatian media nor ICTY's Prosecution! Even if it were for a day, it's way too long when it's about injustice and the victim of communist maniacs and courts. Croatian media had previously attempted to imply to the General an "Irish criminal past," but all those pseudo-media heroes ended up in permanent anonimity (long live "democracy"!) as well as today's "journalists" in "Slobodna Dalmacija" who sign their articles with ever shorter names, in fact by a single letter "H"! HA! But all that has been most seriously rewarded before Carla Del Ponte, Mesić and Sanader, and costs dearly many innocent people, although the persecutors from The Hague and the Government of Croatia never dare to show what kind of maniacs (a la "Ivica Ban Orsat") they use in their campaigns against Croatian Homeland war militaries. Thus, sinister Carla Del Ponte has no past, which the public might learn about at some point; the false witness Mesić is the "stateman-humanist of the 20th century"; while the "ideal political figure" PM Sanader can also be the "politician of the year" for Croatian media services:
Among all scandals about communist past, organized crimes, and deep corruption at the very top of Croatia's government and the Office of president, which the journalists regularly hide under the carpet, only the French past of a Croatian hero is "dark," and that because of the past contacts with French officers whom France awarded with the highest military honours. Croatian communists are truly hard on the past, and what a paradox, they, as well as Mr Sanader in person, often invited the public, to forget the past (and communist crimes). Media runs the pools about the General's French past, but a real question for the pools is the following: CARLA DEL PONTE, IVO SANADER I STJEPAN MESIĆ: Stalinists and traitors of the 21st century's democracy or "politicians of the year" and "humanists"!? Thanks to the ICTY's prosecutors for all their communist "justice," but we don't live in Tito's and Stalin's times. I will stress once more that General Gotovina or his defense have truly nothing with my writing, and aks media shakals not to do them damage for it. My writing concerns their communist past because of which Sanader's and Mesić's maniacs "honour" everyone who doesn't share it with them. But in their mind, and media, that must be the pillar of their "democracy" and "justice" that "does its job." Worry not, HDZ!? IA |
"Političari godine" i "humanisti"!? Haaška i medijsko-politička presuda generalu Gotovini: Prošlost generala Gotovine "mračna" jer je francuska, a ne komunistička 26. kolovoza 2007.
Kao odgovor na moj članak "IVO SANADER: Politički delinkvent ili Idol" od 23. kolovoza, uslijedila je serija povrjeda mojih autorskih prava i izvrćanja teksta na hrvatskim forumima (čak i pod mojim imenom, ništa novo), s čim će se zabaviti ponuđaći forumskih usluga na moj već poslani zahtjev. Da ne spominjem i popratne email-poruka od "Orsata" koje još stižu dok pišem ovaj tekst...
Pored toga, na 23. kolovoza sam dobila "diskretno" upozorenje od glavnog čovjeka HDZ-a u SAD-u koji ima "punu podršku" premijera. Šalje "samo meni" opomenu da nikakvu štetu ne pravim pišući "HDZ-u, bez brige budi, nego sama sebi, Anti i drugima."
Ako tko odgovori na laži i podmećanja braniteljima iz hrvatskog Domovinskog rata, i otkrije njihov izvor (Vlada RH), to će dakle štetiti "meni, Anti [Generalu Anti Gotovini] i drugim" braniteljima. Kao da već ne štete nikomu lažne optužnice protiv zapovjednika Oluje. Isprazan je i beskurupulozan HDZ.
Drugim riječima, priznajmo da smo svi mi kriminalci, pogotovo heroj Domovinskog rata, a Sanader idol svih idola, ili ćemo svi loše proći. Zar može gore biti? Tako su komunisti – staljinisti i titoisti – iznuđivali "velika priznanja" od Hrvata za vrijeme komunističke Jugoslavije i ovijali mrtvom šutnjom nebrojene uništene živote. Ali sad imamo posla s "demokratima," zar ne? HDZ znači Hrvatska demokratska zajednica. Baš i ne... I nije prvi puta da mi HDZ prijeti da će napraviti štetu svima i svemu čemu ja pokazujem poštovanje. Upravo mnogi moji bivši hrvatski prijatelji više ne smiju komunicirati samnom zbog Sanaderovog HDZ-a.
Prvo ću podsjetiti HDZ da ja nisam dio obrambenog tima generala Gotovine (što HDZ zna), i pišem svoje vlastite raščlambe i prosudbe neovisno o bilo kojoj lobističkoj ili političkoj stranki.
Riječ je o tome da je Carla Del Ponte zasada odbila zahtjev obrane Generala Gotovine da on čeka suđenje u kućnom pritvoru, naime u bilo kojoj hrvatskoj kući, što bi mu dalo više mogućnosti za pripremu obrane od optužnice protiv njega i hrvatske Operacije Oluja. Svi drugi optuženici su dobili to pravo pod puno blažim uvjetima od onih koje traži obrana Generala Gotovine.
Carla Del Ponte je odbila zahtjev obrane napose zbog Generalove francuske "mračne prošlosti," za koju nema nijednog svjedoka koji bi se suočio po tom pitanju s generalovim obrambenim timom. Uostalom to upravo nema nikakve veze s generalovom optužnicom za operaciju Oluja, te davno su opovrgnute sve takve teze u službi orkestriranog uništavanja ugleda hrvatskog heroja u njegovu narodu i rušenja svake mu potpore. Ali nećemo sad opet o haaškim "pravilnostima"!
Međutim, više nije jasno, pogotovo nakon progona i zatvaranja hrvatskih anti-komunističkih novinara u Haagu, čime se uistinu bavi i čemu sudi haaško tužiteljstvo skupa s Vladom RH. Zašto je nečija "francuska prošlost" (primjerice, u Francuskoj legiji stranaca) unaprijed "mračna," a komunistička nije, premda su ponajviše komunisti (da, skupa s nacistima i fašistima) od 20. stoljeća napravili najkrvavije stoljeće u povijesti civilizacije!?
S ovim počinje ostvarenje najnovije prijetnje i prljava kampanja u ime HDZ-ovih "političara godine" (Sanadera) i "humanista 20. stoljeća" (Mesića) o kojoj sam eto imala "čast" biti unaprijed obavještena od Sanaderova čovjeka br. 1 u SAD-u.
Vratimo se kronologiji.
Na 22. kolovoza sam primila provokativni email od "Orsata" upravo o "francuskoj prošlosti" generala Gotovine i drugim lažnim konstrukcijama protiv njega. Instiktivno mi je bilo jasno, iz mog ranijeg iskustva s HDZ-om, da je takav materijal popratio Sanaderovo tobožnje "jamstvo" za dopuštanje kućnog pritvora za Generala Gotovinu. To me je navelo konačno postaviti otvoreno pitanje, čak i hrvatskim Biskupima, koje me danima iritiralo, tko je premijer Sanader, politički delinkvent ili idol, i u čemu se sastoji njegovo navodno "katoličanstvo," "intelektualna superiornost," "europejstvo" i tomu sl.
Prije nego što je hrvatskoj javnosti bila poznata odluka Carle Del Ponte i razlozi njezina odbijanja zahtjeva obrane Generala za kućni pritvor, dakle dva dana ranije, "Ivica Ban Orsat" (inače zadužen za manijačke kampanje za Sanadera i Mesića već oko 5 godina, napose protiv moje malenkosti, kojeg je HDZ SAD-a često prenosio na svoje mreže) šalje mi "dosje" o Generalovoj "mračnoj prošlosti" – i to u pre-publikacijskom formatu! Eto odakle je potekla "mračna prošlost" hrvatskog generala koja se potom razvlačila i po nekim stranim medijima!
Ovo je ujedno i odgovor na jedan prijateljski upit : "zašto se uopće obazireš na idiote, beskičmenjake, lažove i manijake poput orsata." Jer "Orsat" kao i ove riječi iz upita pošteno oslikavaju realnost dvostruke, udbaške politike Vlade RH i Sanaderova HDZ-a prema najboljim hrvatskim vojnicima i časnicima.
Na 23. kolovoza, HDZ "diskretno" prijeti da će moj odgovor koštati generala Antu Gotovinu… a već 24. kolovoza "Slobodna Dalmacija," čiji je glavni urednik stari Sanaderov suradnik iz njihove zajedničke komunističke prošlosti (porno-korespondenti za srpski beogradski tisak "Start" i komunističke tajne službe), ujedno i povjerljivi pratitelj iz nedavna Sanaderova posjeta SAD-u, objavljuje naslov: "Gotovini ne vjeruju zbog mračne prošlosti." Anonimni autor koji skriva svoju prošlost ali i sadašnjost ne navodi nijedan jedini argument iz Generalove obrane, druga strana niti nema pravo glasa u "Slobodnoj...". Po tom "novinaru" i Carli Del Ponte , čak i 90-tih godinama, hrvatski se general (pazi, jedan te isti!) istovremeno borio u hrvatskom Domovinskom ratu i bavio kriminalom na tlu Francuske! Ni riječi o izjavi obrane da je "Francuska (je) vlast od 1992. do 2001. s Gotovinom održavala visoke kontakte na vojnoj razini i izdavala mu francuske putovnice."
Nitko se u normalnim uvjetima ne bi obazirao niti na napise anonimnih autora "Slobodne Dalmacije," međutim zbog takvih i sličnih insinuacija i "logike" general je Gotovina već oko 20 mjeseci nevin u zatvoru i to ni hrvatskim medijima ni haaškim tužiteljima nije "predugo"! Da je jedan dan, predugo je kad se radi o nepravdi i žrtvi komunističkih manijaka i sudova.
Sukladno najavljenoj prijetnji HDZ-a, koju bi oni svakako ostvarili i bez mene, svi medijski servisi otvorili su nekontriliranu vatru protiv Generalove "francuske prošlosti" za račun Carle Del Ponte i sljedećeg dana, 25. kolovoza. Orkestrirano. Svijetla im je svima, i legalna, jedino komunistička prošlost koju general Gotovina eto "nažalost" nema.
Ranije su generalu hrvatski mediji pokušali implicirati i "irsku" kriminalnu povijest, ali svi ti medijski pseudo-heroji otišli su u trajnu anonimnost (živjela "demokracija"!) kao i današnji "novinari" "Slobodne Dalmacije" što potpisuju svoje članke sve kraćim imenom, naime sada jednim jedinim slovom "H"! HA!
Ali sve se to najozbiljnije nagrađuje pred Carlom Del Ponte, Mesićem i Sanaderom, i košta brojne nevine ljude, premda se nitko od progonitelja ne usudi pokazati kakvim se manijacima (a la "Ivica Ban Orsat") Haag i Vlada RH služe u kampanji protiv hrvatskih branitelja iz Domovinskog rata.
Mračna Carla Del Ponte eto nema prošlosti, što vjerojatno tek ima izići u javnost; lažni svjedok predsjednik Mesić je "državnik-humanist 20. stoljeća" a "idealna politička figura" premijer Ivo Sanader zna biti i medijski "političar godine":
Od svih skandala o komunističkoj prošlosti, organiziranom kriminalu i neobuzdanoj korupciji u samom vrhu Vlade RH i Uredu predsjednika, što novinari redovito metu pod tepih, "mračna" je jedino "francuska prošlost" jednog hrvatskog heroja, i to zbog bivšeg kontakta s francuskim časnicima kojima je i Francuska odala najviše vojne počasti!
Uistinu su teški komunisti Hrvatske kad je riječ o prošlosti, a paradoksa li, toliko puta su pozvali javnost, pa i Sanader osobno, da zaboravi prošlost (i komunističke zločine).
Mediji postavljaju ankete ipak o generalovoj francuskoj prošlosti, a pravo je pitanje za anketu sljedeće:
CARLA DEL PONTE, IVO SANADER I STJEPAN MESIC: Staljinisti i izdajice demokracije 21. stoljeća ili medijski "političari godine" i "humanisti"!?
Hvala haaškom tužiteljstvu za svu njegovu komunističku "pravdu" ali ipak ne živimo u vrijeme Tite i Staljina.
Ja ću još jedanput napomenuti da General Gotovina ili njegova obrana doista ništa nemaju s mojim pisanjem, i zamoliti medijske šakale da im ne čine štetu zbog toga. Moje pisanje se tiče njihove komunističke prošlosti zbog koje Sanaderovi i Mesićevi medijski manijaci "časte" svakoga tko je s njima ne dijeli. Ali njima je i njihovim medijima sve to valjda "demokracija" i "pravosuđe" koje "radi svoj posao."
"Bez brige," HDZ!?
IA
|
||
|
The Bishops and PM Sanader!?
IVO SANADER: Political Delinquent or Idol?
23 Aug 2007
In Croatia, there’s no demarcation line between hate speech, idolatry and free speech.
The hate speech is reserved for those who expose the tyranny, treasons, and crimes within Croatian governmental structures. The prime minister and his allies are normally investigating the culprits who disclosed their crimes and manipulations instead of facing public accountability for the issues raised. The prime minister’s critics are targeted by hate-mongers via internet, media, and even the courts, and they choose no means to blackmail, discredit, scare off, or intimidate the opponent into silence.
(If you think that I was free to write in calm all that I wrote on my website so far, you may just take a look at the account here registered under my name: http://p088.ezboard.com/uivanaa.bannedPage, and many similar ones, which belonged to the person(s) whom the prime minister tasked with attacking my humble self for about 5 years now, with abusing of my texts, impersonating me, posting the pornography, writing my pseudo-biography and just anything else one could never think of, should there be no HDZ’s campaigners for The Hague’s prosecutors (ICTY)! One of the owners of such an account presented himself as “Ivica Ban Orsat” and I just received yet another irritating email message against General Gotovina from him, hence I publicly seek all legal help that anyone in the world can offer me so to stop that maniac from harassing me once for all. The HDZ Mt. president BM once confirmed to me that prime minister Ivo Sanader had hired several dirty maniacs, and asked them in +, too, to spread lies against my humble self, “Orsat” – former internet host for Mr Sanader being the most persistent and truly the dirtiest; hence, although I don’t expect my former HDZ friend to support me now, I know, even from several sources, where they’re coming from. Meanwhile, read on.)
As we know, Carla Del Ponte has confirmed that Croatian prime minister betrayed Croatian Homeland war (Operation Storm and Gen Gotovina in particular) and did what no country in the world did to its liberators. Mr Sanader pledged his loyalty to The Hague / Carla Del Ponte instead of Croatia. He, together with Carla Del Ponte, defied all true principles of freedom, justice and peace.
Mr Sanader acts as if the final judgment belonged to him on all things Croatian. He can paint into a criminal, falsely accuse, or betray whomever he likes or he can “help” if he likes – he’s the only master of our fate, our prosecutor, denouncer, or saviour…. Dare to oppose the tyran who always complained he couldn’t trust his own people or his own party…!? and he shall get to you. Well, Stalin, too, was “more intelligent than all other people together.”
Thus we come to the idolatry. Mr. Sanader has his Nerudas in the press who will exalt him to any height he can wish. He has Butkovic, Plese, Pavicic….most former communist secret service “journalists” who can always polish his public image, no matter what happens.
Following critical Bishops’s addresses regarding the overall situation in Croatia, the journalist Darko Pavicic has exonerated Mr Sanader by declaring him as an “ideal political figure for the Bishops: a proven Catholic, intellectually superior, polyglot, unquestionable nationalist, and at the same time pro-European and open” – while blaming everything on "the prime minister’s team." (Jutarnji list of 11 August) Probably the same team whom the prime minister couldn’t trust from the very beginning so that he had to invite non-transparent and not-elected parties to Croatia (foreign agents ci-inclus) with whom he held secret meetings in order to create “Croatian” policies – he's an ideal “democrat”! Dare to question either Stalin or his Neruda(s)!
If that’s an idol to the Bishops of Croatia (which I still doubt) – it’s time I quit my website on Croatia, as I quit Croatia 7 years ago. However, Croatia’s Bishops should have saved us all from such idols – in accordance with the First Commandment that forbids assigning a supreme cult of adoration to any man, but especially to Mr Sanader – as we all know what he did. Even the destiny of Croatian Generals (and that of General Gotovina) should now depend on him!? It was so “Catholic,” “nationalistic,” “intellectually superior” and “European” to betray the top commander of the liberation operation Storm that ended the war in Croatia (and in Bosnia and Herzegovina)!?
Mr. Sanader did a lot indeed and he still does. But he was better not to do anything – all he did, was a huge damage to anything that means faith, honour, dignity, ethics, morality, or liberty. Or Croatia.
This exhausts the point on free speech, too.
Iesus Hominum Salvator
IA
|
Asinus asinum fricat II
Biskupi i premijer Sanader!?
IVO SANADER: Politički delikvent ili Idol?
23. kolovoza 2007.
U Hrvatskoj, nema crte razdvajanja između govora mržnje, idolopoklonstva i slobode govora.
Govor je mržnje rezerviran za sve koji prokažu tiraniju, izdaju i kriminal unutar hrvatskih vladajućih struktura. Premijer i njegovi saveznici normalno istražuju krivce što su otkrili njihov kriminal i manipulacije mjesto da odgovorno polože račun pred javnosti za potegnute probleme. Raspirivači mržnje ciljaju kritičare premijera preko interneta, medija, pa čak i sudova, i ne biraju sredstva ucjene, diskreditacije, zastrašivanja ili intimidacije nebili ušutjeli sve kritičare.
(Ako mislite da sam ja slobodno i u miru pisala na mojim stranicama dosada, možete pogledati sljedeći profil pod kojim se pisalo u moje ime: http://p088.ezboard.com/uivanaa.bannedPage, i dosta takvih, što su pripadali osobi ili osobama koje je premijer zadužio za napad na moju malenkost već oko 5 godina, za zlouporabu mojih tekstova, personifikaciju, postiranje pornografije, pisanje moje lažne biografije i upravo svega što nikad ne bismo vjerovali da je moguće da nije HDZ-ovskih lobbyista za haaško tužiteljstvo (MKS)! Jedan od vlasnika takvih profila predstavio se kao "Ivica Ban Orsat" i upravo sam primila još jednu iritantnu email poruku od njega protiv generala Gotovine, stoga sad javno tražim pravnu pomoć koju bilo tko u svijetu može ponuditi tako da taj manijak prestane s maltretiranjem jedanput za sva vremena. Predsjednik HDZ-a za Mt. BM jedanput mi je potvrdio da je premijer Ivo Sanader zadužio nekoliko prljavih manijaka, i tražio i od HDZ-ovaca u Canadi da šire laži protiv moje malenkosti, gdje je "Orsat" – bivši net-domaćin Sanaderova gostovanja na forumu najistrajniji i uistinu najprljaviji; tako, premda ne očekujem da će me i sada moj bivši prijatelj javno podržati, znam, također iz nekih drugih izvora, odakle sve to dolazi. U međuvremenu, čitajte dalje.)
Zna se, Carla Del Ponte je potvrdila da je hrvatski premijer izdao hrvatski Domovinski rat (Operaciju Oluja, posebice generala Gotovinu) i napravio što nijedna država u svijetu nije svojim osloboditeljima i braniteljima. Prisegu je Sanader dao Haagu i Carli Del Ponte mjesto Hrvatskoj. Skupa s Carlom Del Ponte, porazio je sva načela slobode, pravde i mira.
Sanader se ponaša kao da konačni sud o svim hrvatskim pitanjima pripada njemu. Može ocrniti u kriminalca, lažno osuditi ili izdati koga želi, a može i "pomoći" ako mu se prohtije – on je jedini gospodar naše sudbine, prokazivač ili spasitelj…. Odvaži li se tko usprotiviti se tiraninu koji se žalio da ne može vjerovati svom vlastitom narodu i svojoj stranki…!? i on će mu/joj već doskočiti. Pa i Staljin je bio “inteligentiji od svih ljudi zajedno."
Tako smo došli do idolopoklonstva. Sanader ima svoje Nerude u medijima koji će ga podignuti u visine kakve zamisli. Ima Butkovića, Plešu, Pavičića….većinu "novinara" bivših komunističkih tajnih službi koji su uvijek spemni polirati njegov javni imidž, ma što se dogodi.
Nakon kritičnih poruka hrvatskih Biskupa glede ukupnog stanja u Hrvatskoj, novinar Darko Pavičić odriješio je Sanadera svih grijeha: Sanader je hrvatskim biskupima "idealan lik političara: osvjedočeni katolik, intelektualno superioran, poliglot, nacionalno nedvojben, a istodobno i europski orijentiran i otvoren. ” – a za sve je kriv "premijerov tim." (Jutarnji list, 11 kolovoza) Vjerojatno isti onaj tim kojem premijer nije mogao vjerovati odpočetka te je sazivao tajne sastanke po Hrvatskoj s netransparetnim i ni od koga izabranim strankama (uključujući i strane agente) da kroje "hrvatsku" politiku – idealan je to “demokrat”! Tko se usudi dovesti u pitanje Staljina ili njegove Nerude!
Ako je to idol hrvatskih Biskupa (što još sumnjam) – vrijeme mi je napustiti moje stranice kao što sam napustila Hrvatsku prije nekih 7 godina. Ipak, hrvatski Biskupi su nas trebali zaštiti od takvih idola – sukladno prvoj Zapovijedi Božijoj koja zabranjuje kult obožavanja bilo kojeg čovjeka, a pogotovo Sanadera – zna se što je on napravio. Čak je i sudbina hrvatskih Generala (i sudbina generala Gotovine) u njegovim rukama? "Katolički," "nacionalno," "intelektualno superiorno" i "europski" je bilo izdati najviše zapovjednike osloboditeljske operacije Oluja kojom je zaustavljen rat u Hrvatskoj (a i Bosni i Hercegovini)!?
Sanader je doista previše napravio, kao što i danas pravi – sve što je napravio, bila je golema šteta svemu što predstavlja vjeru, čast, dostojanstvo, etiku, moral, ili slobodu. Ili Hrvatsku.
Ovim se iscrpljuje i tema o slobodi govora.
Iesus Hominum Salvator
IA
|
||
|
WHO’S BLACKMAILED IN CROTIAN RULING PARTY HDZ:
HAAG & HDZ TROJAN HORSES IN +
IA
12 Jun 2007
Croatian prime minister Ivo Sanader has imposed the precepts of betrayal of Croatia and an “unconditional cooperation” with The Hague’s political court as a sole criteria for appointing the officials in his party and in the government. His treason criteria has been applied to the HDZ in Croatian Diaspora as well.
Today, HDZ in Diaspora has dropped to the 1-man to 3-men branches in Western countries, who only act upon their tyrannical chief’s Sanader’ request for their support in his betrayal of Croatian generals and Croatia’s defense war, unless they go further and campaign in a typical Stalinist-Titoist way so to “blacken” everyone who opposes Sanader (also on Sanader’s request.)
Contrary to all principles of the western democracies and their attitude towards their armed forces, and despite the fact that Croatian armed forces have been recognized by the western powers as a highly professional and positive force – equally as General Ante Gotovina who led operation Strom that liberated Croatia (now falsely accused by Carla Del Ponte), my HDZ compatriot in + will teach us Sanader’s communist lesson even here so to express his disagreement with my writing.
Thus Mr Tonci Coric, the HDZ + branch leader writes:
“No one extradited [Croatian] generals [to The Hague] by singing, but equally [no one] couldn’t afford for Croatia to be blackmailed because of its generals [!?] which would be worse for Croatia and its progress overall.”
For this they had to be betrayed. We have never heard that a western politician in a democracy betrayed its generals for blackmail! And would Croatia be so much blackmailed have Croatian politicians not betrayed Croatian generals so cheaply and shamelessly and sadly!? For whose progress? Croatia is being plunged back into Balkan’s bloody embrace.
The problem with Coric’s poor statement is that Croatian politicians are blackmailed, and perhaps he too – and, not Croatia. They’ve been both morally and politically corrupted so that they’re forced to cooperate with Belgrade and The Hague, otherwise they would have no support anywhere else, and there would be nothing to maintain them in the positions of power.
“Computer will be deciding,” Sanader has just revealed how his justice system works in Croatia (and probably the electoral one, too, given that he came to power by cheating at the very beginning of his treason-programmed career.) Sanader’s computer has some serious Trojan horses within its operation system, who spred also to SDP and other parties of influence in Croatia. And not only in Croatia, given the email I received from HDZ +’s leader.
Indeed, the HDZ + leaders confined to me a long while ago that they would be “nothing” without their positions in the HDZ, although they don’t really agree with Sanader.
Nothing is indeed the one of whom Sanader makes a man. They can sing together: “Strike harder, the maniac” in Sanader’s electoral campaign like in a lead song from Sanader’s past campaign.
Please view the youtube video of Sanader's electoral band – the message is quite explicit about red-maniacs in Croatia (this video file contains violent content, and it shouldn’t be viewed by sensitive public and minors):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiThOk8jBOE
Hence, who’s “blackmailed”?
For such maniacs, Croatian generals have been betrayed.
It is truly sad that a beautiful, once noble Croatia, is led by such maniacs.
For my HDZ friend from Mt. and Sanader I can only say:
Asinus asinum fricat.
IA
|
UCIJENJENI POLITIČARI U HDZ-U: HAAG, HDZ I TROJANSKI KONJI U CANADI
12. lipnja 2007.
Hrvatski premijer Ivo Sanader nametnuo je pravilo izdaje Hrvatske i “bezuvjetnu suradnju” s haaškim političkim sudom kao jedini kriterij podjele pozicija moći unutar HDZ-a kao i njegove vlade. Njegov kriterij izdaje sad je primjenjen i u HDZ-u u hrvatskom iseljeništvu.
Danas je HDZ u iseljeništvu pao na ogranke u zapadnim zemljama koje broje od 1 do 3 čovjeka, i koji nešto rade tek kad tiranski šef Sanader zatraži njihovu podršku za izdaju hrvatskih generala i hrvatskog obrambenog rata, izuzev kad se upuste i u “ocrnjivanje,” u tipičnom staljinističko-titoističkom stilu, svakoga tko se usprotivi politici Ive Sanadera (također na Sanaderov zahtjev).
Protivno načelima svih zapadnih demokracija i njihova odnosa prema svojim oružanim snagama, te unatoč činjenici da su hrvatske oružane snage priznate u zapadnom svijetu kao visoko profesionalna i pozitivna sila – skupa s generalom Antom Gotovinom koji je vodio operaciju oslobađanja Hrvatske Oluja (sada lažno optuženom u Haagu), moj HDZ sunarodnjak u Kanadi će nam predavati Sanaderovu komunističku lekciju i ovdje kako bi izrazio protivljenje mom pisanju.
Tako gosp. Tonči Ćorić, predsjednik kanadskog ogranka HDZ piše:
“Nitko generale nije izručio pjevajući, ali se isto tako nije moglo dopustiti da Hrvatska s generalima bude ucijenjivana, što bi bilo još gore za Hrvatsku i njeni probitak uopće.“
Zato su oni morali biti izdani. Nikad nismo čuli da je jedan zapadni političar u demokraciji izdao svoje generale zbog ucjene! A zar bi Hrvatska bila toliko ucjenjivana da hrvatski političari nisu izdali hrvatske generale tako jeftino i besramno!? I za čiji probitak? Hrvatska je zagnjurena natrag u balkanski krvavi zagrljaj.
Problem s Ćorićevom jadnom izjavom je u tome što su hrvatski političari ucijenjeni, i možda i on s njima – a ne Hrvatska. Oni su moralno i politički bankroptirali tako da su prisiljeni surađivati s Beogradom i Haagom, inače nigdje drugo nebi našli potporu za svoju politiku, i nitko drugi ih ne bi držao na vlasti.
Sve će “kompjutor odlučivati,” upravo je objavio Sanader kako radi njegovo pravosuđe (a možda i izbori, jer je prijevarom došao na vlast i na početku svoje karijere programirane na izdaju). Sanaderov kompjutor ima doista opasne Trojance, koji su zarazili čak i SDP i druge utjecajne stranke u Hrvatskoj. I ne samo u Hrvatskoj, obzirom na poruku koju mi posla predsjednik HDZ-a za Kanadu.
Upravo su mi čelnici HDZ-a za Kanadu povjerili jedanput davno da bi oni bili “nitko i ništa” bez svojih pozicija u HDZ-u, premda se ne slažu sa Sanaderom.
Nitko je i ništa uistinu čovjek kojeg Sanader pravi čovjekom. Mogu s njim pjevati “Udri jače, manijače” u Sanaderovoj predizbornoj kampanji, što je bila vodeća pjesma i na protekloj.
Molim pogledajte snimku Sanaderovog popratnog izbornog benda – poruka crvenih manijaka je posve eksplicitna (ovaj video sadrži nasilnički sadržaj i nije za osjetljivu javnost i maloljetne):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiThOk8jBOE
Dakle, tko je “ucijenjen”?
Za takve manijake, trebalo je izdati hrvatske generale.
Doista je žalosno što prekrasnom plemenitom Hrvatskom vladaju manijaci.
Za mog HDZ prijatelja u Mt.u i Sanadera, imam samo reci:
Asinus asinum fricat.
IA
Cijelu raspravu s Tončijem Ćorić, predsjednikom HDZ-+, koja je prethodila ovom članku, možete pročitati ovdje: HDZ-+ |
||
|
Trouble with Sanader: Have the NATO countries betrayed their generals…. Sanader’s lecture learned from Croatia vs. greater Serbia morally and politically unacceptable 19 May 2007 In response to the latest pandemonium in Belgrade, created by the Serbian Radical Party with its revived Greater Serbia ideology in the hotbed of Serbian politics – the Serbian parliament, Croatian prime minister Sanader rightly stated that “Croatia cannot be neutral because of its difficult history.” ("Trouble with neighbours / Prime Minister: Idea Of Great Serbia Is Not Dead," Javno, 15 May 07) “Great Serbia may be dead, but the party that promotes the ideology got the majority of votes, said Sanader and stressed NATO's importance.” “Great Serbia is dead, but the party that promotes this ideology has won the greatest number of votes. Had we been a member of NATO in 1991…” Had we been … Sanader. We don’t know what there might have been, but we do know what there was. There were Croatian armed forces led by General Ante Gotovina, who planned with the US a joint military operation Storm. They had defeated and deterred the threat of Greater Serbia in both Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Prime minister Sanader should have stressed their importance as for 1991-.... If the horror of Milosevic’s Greater Serbia threat is on the horizon again, as it firmly is, it's due to Sanader and his not only “neutral” but also “full and unconditional cooperation” with Carla Del Ponte with whom he made a political deal so to betray Croatian Homeland war heroes. Sanader’s blind cooperation with the political court in The Hague resulted in the false indictments, and permanent threats and blackmails, against Croatia by Belgrade, and The Hague, respectively. Most Croatian neighbours, of good or evil will, now re-draw their maps as they please because Croatian governmental policies repeatedly showed an ultimate weakness at defending Croatian national interests, and made Croatia into an easy target for just anyone. While he wishes to Serbia a "prosperity", “Sanader, of course, has no intention of supporting the Serbian threat of the independence of Republika Srpska in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” “We want one unified Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia will not support such Serbian threats,” he said. Then why did Sanader hand over Croatia and its operation Storm of 1995 to The Hague, although the Storm had put an end to Greater Serbia aspirations towards Bosnia-Herzegovina as well? Also, he keeps silent – and silences down everyone in Croatia’s public life – about recent political scandals in The Hague at the expense of that same Bosnia-Herzegovina, and at Croatian expense in particular, and he’s quite notorious, if not tyrannical, at this task. Whatever Sanader’s intention may be, he cannot be counted upon. When he handed over Croatian generals to The Hague, foolishly enough, didn’t anticipate the renewal of the threat of Greater Serbia. Now he admits the failure of his politics and declares: “Idea Of Great Serbia Is Not Dead.” Equally, Sanader wasn’t capable of identifying the capabilities to defeat this treat, in spite of the lessons learned from 1991-1995. He was only sucessful at “identifying, locating, arresting, and transfering” Croatian generals to The Hague! He surpassed Milosevic. Obviously, Sanader is the least competent person to lead Croatia into the NATO. Had the NATO countries betrayed their brave generals, as Sanader did betray Croatia’s, who would have defended Croatia in 1991 then? His hypothesis about the NATO is absolutely out of touch with reasonable national security principles. It's contradictory to his politics towards The Hague. If the events in Serbia proved anything, they proved both him and Carla Del Ponte to be wrong! The key national security strategy milestone in the NATO countries and on what the NATO countries rely upon when faced with the national security threat is that they first and foremost rely on their own capabilities, of course. The NATO countries protect their vital interests in all national spheres so to provide for this capability. And what does this capability chiefly depend on: On highly devoted and qualified military personnel, whish is key to success at deterring and defeating a national security threat. Hence, Sanader is not only neutral but in denial as well. He ignores and denies the role of the Croatian forces in the 1991-1995 in face of Greater Serbia threat, in spite of their then proven capability to defend Croatia. General Gotovina, truly European, western, professional, military commander, proved himself capable of ending Greater Serbia, but he become the key target of prosecution by Sanader and Carla Del Ponte. Hence, Sanader remains neutral, ignorant, in denial, and doesn’t stress the true importance in respect to Croatia’s recent history and Croatia’s heroes of the war of independence but some “had there been….” It’s much worse than being “neutral.” It’s both morally and politically unacceptable in both Croatia and NATO countries. IA
|
VoC's Democracy Blog zahvaljuje Hrvatski uljudbeni pokret za objavu članka "Problemi sa Sanaderom.." Problemi sa Sanaderom: Da su članice NATO-a izdale svoje generale…. Sanaderove pouke iz Hrvatske naspram velike Srbije moralno i politički neprihvatljive 19. 05. 2007
Sanader, "normalizacija" i srbijanska vojska U odgovoru na najnoviji pandemonium u Belgradu, što ga je podigla iz groba Srpska radikalna stranka sa svojom velikosrpskom ideologijom u žarištu srpske politike – u srpskom parlamentu, hrvatski premijer Sanader pravo reče da “Hrvatska ne može biti neutralna upravo zbog svoje teške povijesti.” ("Problemi sa susjedima / Sanader: Ideja o Velikoj Srbiji nije još umrla," Javno, 15.05.07) "Velika Srbija jest mrtva, ali stranka koja promiče tu ideologiju dobila je najviše glasova, kazao je jučer Sanader ističući važnost NATO-a." "Velika Srbija jest mrtva, ali stranka koja promiče tu ideologiju dobila je najviše glasova. Da smo 1991. godine bili članica NATO-a..." Da smo bili... Sanaderu. Ne znamo što bi bilo da je bilo, ali znamo što jest. Bile su hrvatske oružane snage koje je predvodio general Ante Gotovina, što su skupa sa SAD-om isplanirale združenu vojnu operaciju Oluja. Porazile su i otklonile ugroz velike Srbije kako u Hrvatskoj tako i u Bosni i Hercegovini. Premijer je trebao naglasiti njihovu važnost kada je riječ o 1991.-1995. Ako je užas velikosrpskog ugroza iznova na hrvatskome vidiku, kao što uistinu jest, za to je kriv Sanader i njegova ne samo "neutralna" nego i "puna i bezuvjetna" suradnja s Carlom Del Ponte s kojom je sklopio politički dogovor o izdaji heroja hrvatskog domovinskog rata. Sanaderova je slijepa suradnja s političkim sudom u Haagu dovela do lažnih optužnica, te trajnih ugroza, i ucjena Hrvatske, od Beograda, i Haaga. Većina hrvatskih susjeda, dobre ili loše volje, sada prekraja mape kako im se svidi jer hrvatska službena politika kontinuirano pokazuje krajnju slabost pri obrani hrvatskih nacionalnih interesa, i pretvara Hrvatsku u olak plijen upravo svima. Dok Srbiji želi "prosperitet", "Srpsku prijetnju za samostalnost Republike Srpske u BiH, Sanader, jasno, ne namjerava podržati." "Mi želimo jednu jedinstvenu Bosnu i Hercegovinu i takve srpske prijetnje Hrvatska neće podržati - poručio je" Zašto je onda Sanader isporučio Haagu Hrvatsku i njezinu operaciju Oluju 1995, kad je Oluja okončala velikosrpske težnje i prema Bosni i Hercegovini? Također je zašutio - i ušutio sve u hrvatskoj javnosti - o posljednjim haaškim političkim skandalima na štetu te iste Bosne i Hercegovine te nadasve na hrvatsku štetu, a u ušutkivanju se pokazao notoran, ako ne i tiranin. Što god kanio Sanader, na njega se ne može računati. Kad je isporučo hrvatske generale Haagu, posve suludo, nije predvidio novi velikosrpski ugroz. Sad priznaje propast svoje politike i izjavljuje: "Ideja o Velikoj Srbiji nije još umrla." Jednako, Sanader nije identificirao djelotvorne mogućnosti i sredstva odvraćanja tog ugroza, unatoč poučku iz 1991.-1995. On se pokazao sposobnim tek pri "identificiranju, lociranju, uhićenju i isporuci" hrvatskih generala Haagu. Ni Milošević mu nije u tom ravan. Jasno, Sanader nije osoba koja je kompetentna povesti Hrvatsku u NATO. Da su NATO zemlje izdale svoje hrabre generale kao što je Sanader izdao hrvatske, tko bi tad obranio Hrvatsku 1991. i kasnije? Njegova hipoteza o NATO-u je absolutno besmislena s pozicije razumnih načela nacionalne sigurnosti. Kontradiktorna je politici koju vodi s Carlom Del Ponte, i događaji u Srbiji su jedino to dokazali. Temeljno načelo nacionalne sigurnosti u NATO zemljama sastoji se u osiguranju vlastite sposobnosti za obranu prije oslanjanja na bilo koju drugu, usljed nacionalnog ugroza. NATO zemlje štite svoje vlastite interese na svim razinama nacionalnog života. O čemu ovisi sposobnost za to: O visoko odanom i kvalificiranom vojnom osoblju, što je ključ uspjeha odvraćanja i poraza nacionalnih ugroza. Stoga, Sanader nije samo neutralan, nego i u odricanju. Ignorira i poriče ulogu hrvatskih snaga 1991.-1995. naspram velikosrpskog ugroza, unatoč njihovoj tada dokazanoj sposobnosti obraniti Hrvatsku. General Gotovina, istinski europski, zapadni, profesionalni vojni zapovjednik, dokazao je svoju sposobnost pri odvraćanju velikosrpskog ugroza, ali je postao glavni cilj progona za Sanadera i Carlu Del Ponte. Stoga, Sanader ostaje neutralan, ignorantan, u odricanju i poricanju, i ne ističe što je istinski bitno u svezi hrvatske novije povijesti i hrvatskih heroja u ratu za neovisnost, nego nekakva "da smo bili..." To je puno gore nego biti "neutralan" i nije niti moralno niti politički prihvatljivo kako za Hrvatsku tako ni za jednu NATO zemlju. IA
|
||
|
Former Yugoslavian capital Belgrade moved to Zagreb and The Hague (their dreams and our nightmares)
14 May 2007
While Croatian official politics went through seven years of famine, “crowned” with its betrayal of General Ante Gotovina, his entire war-wining Croatian army and Croatia, and a false promise of “democratization of Serbia” – the Serbian radical party advanced to win a parliamentarian majority in Serbia and seeks alliance with Russia against Croatia and the West.
Serbian radical party opposes the “secession of Croatia from Yugoslavia” and seeks to “recover” its “Krajina” para-state in Croatia, termed as “Republika Srpska Krajina.”
“The only way to normalize Serb-Croat relations in the future is to end the occupation of Republika srpska krajina and [draw] a final demarcation [line] between Serbia and Croatia.“
For Vojislav Seselj's radicals supported by a majority of Serbian people, Croatia is a “new NDH”, “founded on crime and occupation”. Serbia's Radicals had foolishly expected their 1991-1995 occupation of Croatia to be internationally recognized, which would have come true unless a “new ustashee government with American silent approval and logistic support launched their brutal invasion against the UN protected zones.” Nikolic, Seselj's deputy, now publicly seeks Russian alliance for Serbian revange against the US.
“The Ustashe government” is a popular Serb-Chetnick-communist syntagme that was used in communist Yugoslavia for nearly half a century as a “licence to kill” and prosecute Croatians with no court, no law, and no God. It was meant to justify even the most recent genocide over Croatians in the “memorandum“ issued by the Radical party and still available at its official webiste.
In spite of Serbia's immediate, internal problem of Kosovo, The Radicals assign a higher priority to Croatia, in the same way Milosevic did – and they're only missing the means, and Russia.
Of course, for most Serbs who had participated in, or approved of agression against Croatia, it's not easy to digest the fact that Serbia had sent so many “Serbian volunteers” to Croatia (chetnik para-military units, yugoslav army, other mercenaries: the terrorists like in the worst horror movie produced in a joint communist-fascist scenario), and had maintained their brutal occupation over 2/3 of Croatia for nearly half a decade, and then lost their aggression war.
However, it is true that until now some Croatian politicians only 'watched the terrorism on the TV when it was happening in other countries' – as we recently learned about Minister Kirin's awakening... What did he do in the war, by the way – did he watch the action movies with terrorism themes in other countries, while Gen Ante Gotovina's army was fighting for his safety and Croatia's safety?
But now again, Šešelj's Deputy Nikolić, greated with the big ovations in Serbian parliament, “temporarily withdraws” and promises to continue his close oversight of Serbian politics.
During all this time, Croatian official politics declare the “normalization” of relations with Serbia – Croatia's recently defeated agressor – ; and in that honour hand over the General to The Hague.
Croatia had truly no national interest and even less a moral duty towards Serbia and its recovery following Milosevic-led murder of over 10,000 Croatians and non-Serbs in Croatia (as well as of the Serbs who refused to cooperate with Milosevic's forces); the hundreds of thousands Croatian refugies fleeing the Serb-occupied territory of Croatia, and an immesurable human and material damage inflicted upon the entire Croatian people. None among Croatian politicians seriously tackes the issue of war reperations! And certainly, Croatia had even a lesser right to betray the leader of its armed forces who liberated Croatia and helped save Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Still, the prime minister Sanader parades in front of the Serbian army in Belgrade, shares the credit with president Mesic for the “normalization” between Serbia and Croatia. But, the 15th anniversary of Croatia's international recognition went unnoticed, there was no Croatian military parade, no Croatian flags in Croatia celebrating that day. So much about their caring for international recognitions...
And what shall all these missionaries and congratulators of the Serbian “democracy” say now when the result of their “democratization” became so transparent?
Will Croatian politicians still say they “said everything they needed to say” and hence the Hague will not be included in their election campaign?
Judging by their reactions, if not by their silence, former Yugoslavian capital Belgrade moved to Zagreb and The Hague. It is only a matter of time when honest Croatian “partisans” will realize the conspiracy, after being infiltrated by so many Serbian chetniks within their ranks, to whom Croatian government granted the amnesty for the war crimes against Croatia, and drafted them for its “action plans” against betrayed Croatian war veterans.
“Croatian president Stjepan Mesic and the prime minister Ivo Sanader greeted today the news about preliminary agreement to form a pro-European government in Serbia in which there would be no place for the Radicals and their idea that Serbian border should stop at Virovitica-Karlovac-Karlobag demarcation line. (JL, 12 May 07)
Where do they believe the demarcation line should “stop” if not there? That intended greater Serbia demercation line was “stopped” in 1995, wasn't it?
Of course, Mesic, Sanader and their Serbian “democrats” would like to erase the borders, and form Balkan union, but they don't call it precisely by the name of “Yugoslavia” as it wouldn't be wise to do so before the elections, and given all the infamy attached to it. They call it even EU. Neither they call themeseves former “communists,” “udba collaborators,” and similar titles from their past careers; now they disolved into “democrats.”
“I believe that a great majority of Serbian citizens doesn't think this way – stated the minister Grabar-Kitarovic” in connection with the Radicals' winning affair in Serbia.
We can only imagine what the Serbian officials would say if there were really an “ustashe government” ever happened in new Croatian state (non-sense) (by the way, those who had been among ustashe in WWII belong to an almost entirely killed or destroyed generation by now) – as notorious fascist, criminal Serbian chetnick leaders appeared and still reappear in Serbia (Milosevic, Seselj, and now the deputy of the latter, Nikolic). Serbia forcibly proclaims each Croatian government as “ustashe” or “criminal” each time Croatia makes its own, European steps, and not the Balkan ones. Many processes in The Hague testify to this precisely.
Hence, whom Croatian state officials represent? In what does consist Serbia’s merit so that the Republic of Croatia’s minister defends it?
The dead silence by Croatian government soon after the latest scandalous revelations concerning The Hague's trials, such as exempting the key Serbian documents that would probably prove Serbian official politics in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina as genocidal, also confirms that the prime minister Sanader knew from the very beginning what Carla Del Ponte was doing. However, Croatian prime minister complied with Carla Del Ponte's position against Croatia's defense war that doesn't truly differs from that of the Serbian Radicals. The prime minister Sanader maintained Carla Del Ponte in power granting her the credibility and importance that she doesn't deserve – and vice versa.
When Dr Andrija Hebrang published his column on genocide and history, entitled “International community helped genocide in Croatia”, on 6 March 07, the HDZ's and Sanader's governmnet spokesman Ratko Maček spoke up already on 7 March 07: “Those are Hebrang's personal views”. Zna se.
SDP's candidate Milanović, calls Dr Hebrang the “hawk” who “doesn't fly in a flock” Which flock should he just fly in?
Perhaps, The Hague's “hawks” should have been explained that the “international community” (as well as “European Union”) in Croatian official wisdom have been reduced to the “democraticized Serbia” (as just described above, in the person of the Radical Nikolic, closely followed by the “moderate nationalist“ Kostunica), and to the political tribunal in The Hague that revives the KGB spirit sold down as democracy. There's been no other democratic achievment – or any other - that Croatian current officials accomplished since they came in power in Croatia – although the promises were many.
IA
|
J ugoslavenski službeni Beograd preselio u Zagreb i Haag(njihovi snovi i naše more)
14 svibnja 2007
Dok je Hrvatska vodila 7 gladnih godina službene politike, s ciljem “demokratizacije Srbije,” da bi izdala hrvatskog generala Antu Gotovinu, sve časne hrvatske vojnike i Hrvatsku, u Srbiji je Srpska radikalna stranka ojačala do osvajanja parlamentarne većine. Sprski radikali prijete Rusijom protiv Hrvatske i Zapada.
Srpska radikalna stranka ne priznaje «otcjepljenje hrvatske od Jugoslavije» i traži «povrat» ilegalne «Republike srpske krajine».
«Jedini način za normalizaciju odnosa Srba i Hrvata u budućnosti jeste prekid okupacije Republike srpske Krajine i konačno srpsko-hrvatsko razgraničenje.»
Šešeljevim radikalima koji i danas uživaju potporu većine srpskog naroda, Hrvatska je «nova NDH» , «utemeljena na zločinu». Radikali su suludo očekivali međunarodno priznanje srpske okupacije iz ranih 90-tih, što bi se po njihovu «tarotu» i ostvarilo da nije «nova ustaška vlast uz prećutnu suglasnost i logističku podršku Amerikanaca» krenula u «brutalnu invaziju na zaštićenu teritoriju Ujedinjenih nacija». Nikolić, Šešeljov zamjenik, javno traži savezništvo s Rusijom protiv Amerike.
A «ustaška vlast» je četničko-komunistička sintagma što je islužila pola stoljeća umjetnoj komunističkoj državi Jugoslaviji kao «dozvola za ubijanje» i progon Hrvata bez suda, bez zakona, bez Boga. Trebala je opravdati i novije zločine nad Hrvatima već u «memorandumu» SRS.
SRS, unatoč Kosovu, još uvijek se više bavi Hrvatskom, na isti način kao i Milošević – fale još samo sredstva.
Naravno, nije lako pomiriti se s činjenicom da je Srbija poslala tolike «srpske dragovoljce» (četnike, JNA... teroriste) u Hrvatsku i zapravo pola desetljeća držala Hrvatsku pod brutalnom okupacijom kao u najgorem krimiću po komunističko-fašističkom scenariju, te izgubila agresorski rat.
Premda su terorizam neki današnji hrvatski političari jedino « gledali na televiziji u drugim zemljama” – doznajemo od ministra Kirina... Što je on radio u ratu, gledao acijske filmove s terorističkim temama u drugim zemljama dok se vojska generala Ante Gotovina borila za njegovu sigurnost i sigurnost Hrvatske?
No sada, Šešeljov zamjenik Nikolić, pozdravljen pljeskom u srpskom parlamentu, opet se privremeno povlači, obećava svoj daljnji utjecaj na srpsku politiku.
Dakle, sve ove godine, hrvatska službena politika se «normalizira», sa Srbijom, poraženim agresorom na Hrvatsku, i u to ime izručuje svoje pobjedničke generale političkom sudu u Haagu.
U najboljem slučaju, hrvatska vlast nije imala absolutno nikakva nacionalnog interesa a još manje moralne obveze za Srbijin oporavak nakon preko 10,000 ubijenih Hrvata i ne-Srba u Hrvatskoj (ali i Srba koji su bili protiv agresije), nakon stotina tisuća hrvatskih prognanika, i goleme materijalne štete koju nitko ozbiljno ne poteže. Još manje je imala pravo izdati svoju vojsku.
Nakon svega, premijer Sanader prodefilira ispred srpske vojske u Beogradu, on s Mesićem podijeli zasluge za «normalizaciju» sa Srbijom, a 15-ta obljetnica priznanja Hrvatske prođe bez defilea hrvatske vojske, bez hrvatskih zastava u Hrvatskoj.
I što danas kažu svi misionari i čestitari srpske demokracije kad se vidi rezultat «demokratizacije»?
Jeli još uvijek vjeruju hrvatski političari da su rekli «sve što su imali reći» o Haagu i neće o tome u predizbornoj kampanji?
Sudeći po nekim njihovim reakcijama, i tišini, jugoslavenski se službeni Beograd preselio u Zagreb i Haag. Pitanje je samo kad će se osvijestiti današnji pošteni «partizani» među koje su prešli toliki četnici, amnestirani za zločine u Hrvatskoj, članovi vladinih «akcijskih planova».
« Predsjednik Stjepan Mesić i premijer Ivo Sanader pozdravili su danas vijest o načelnom dogovoru o formiranju proeuropske vlade u Srbiji u kojoj ne bi bilo mjesta za radikale i njihove ideje da se srpska granica zaustavi na crti Virovitica - Karlovac - Karlobag.»
Gdje će se, po njima, «zaustaviti» granica ako neće na toj crti? Ta je granica zaustavljena 1995, zar ne?
Naravno, Mesic, Sanader, i njihovi srpski «demokrati» brišu granice, stvaraju Balkansku uniju, ne zovu je pred izbore Jugoslavija zbog lošeg imena.... Ni oni se više ne zovu komunisti, udbaški suradnici, i tomu slično, nego «demokrati».
“ Vjerujem da velika većina građana Srbije tako ne razmišlja - izjavila je ministrica Grabar-Kitarović.» povodom istupa SRS.
Možemo predpostaviti što bi Srpski dužnosnici rekli da se u Hrvatskoj uistinu pojavila «ustaška vlast» (uglavnom pobijena ili uništena generacija iz 2. svjetskog rata), kao što se u Srbiji pojavila i redovito pojavljuje četnička. Oni svaku hrvatsku vlast nasilu prozivaju «ustaškom» i «zločinačkom» svaki puta kada Hrvatska krene svojim putem, europskim, mjesto balkanskim. Mnogi haaški procesi svjedoče upravo tomu.
Dakle, koga zastupaju hrvatski državni dužnosnici? Po čemu je Srbija zaslužila da je ministrica RH brani.
Sudeći po svemu, pogotovo mrtvoj tišini hrvatske vlade uskoro nakon izbijanja haaških skandala, među inim i utaje srpskih dokumenata, jasno je da je premijer Sanader znao što Carla Del Ponte radi, ali je pristao na stav protiv hrvatskog obrambenog rata koji se bitno ne razlikuje od stava SRS. Premijer Sanader je Carlu Del ponte održavao na čelu haaškog suda dajući joj kredibilitet i važnost na koju ona realno nema pravo.
Kada je na 6. ožujka Dr Andrija Hebrang objavio kolumnu o genocidu i povijesti, naslovljenu « Međunarodna zajednica pomogla genocid u Hrvatskoj,” već na 7. ožujka HDZ-ov stranački glasnogovornik i glasnogovornik Sanaderove vlade Ratko Maček istrčava u javnost: «To su osobni Hebrangovi stavovi.» Zna se.
Usput ga i Milanović, SDP-ov kandidat, naziva «jastrebom» koji «ne leti u jatu.» Kojem to jatu?
Haaškim «jastrebovima» je valjda trebalo pojasniti da se «međunarodna zajednica» (kao i «EU») aktualne hrvatske politike minimalizirala na «demokratiziranu Srbiju» (vidjeli smo kakvu) te političko haaško sudište u stilu KGB-a. Drugog pomaka hrvatske službene politike nigdje u stvarnosti nema.
IA
|
||
|
CICAK’S “RATHER LARGE” HEROISM MADE PUBLIC LT, 22 Apr 2007 (all links are in Croatian) May we finally stretch, relax and take a closer look at a would-be victim in Croatian media’s horror scene – the main protagonist is among living, safe but perhaps not quite sane. Ivan Zvonimir Cicak complained in media that general Ante Gotovina’s brother “threatened to murder him” if he continues to call his brother names in his abusive columns. “The traitor, the informant, the denouncer…” Cicak published his angry masterpiece all over again, 1247 words to be precise, half of which is hardly comprehensible Balkan slang, and half the quotes re-written by his own “rather large person” from his previous “rather large writing accomplishments” – and two minutes later, he’s still alive, contrary to the alleged threat that he’d be killed. The quoted attributes here also belong to the latest Cicak’s self-assessment, that is, his “writing accomplishment.” He must feel born again. Well, no. Cicak is condemned to live the way he is. He “cannot do otherwise,” he complains. So our brave Cicak now states that "he was in a similar situation [when he was in Yugoslav prison], but in different circumstances and for a different reason, which is right now happening to Ante Gotovina, the current indictee. However, he [Gen Gotovina] has no capacity to face his situation in which he happened to be.” Here’s a situation. Cicak has forgotten that he just labeled, once again, Gen Gotovina as an “informant, traitor, and denouncer”? We can easily concede, Gen Gotovina has no such capacity. But Cicak has it and Croatians have always suspected his role in Yugoslav prison. Now, we must clarify who threatened whom by murder. There's been an article at Democracy blog about Cicak in "European, Racan's and Sanader's Croatia" calls for murder? (19 March, 2007). Cicak first tried to distort and reverse the famous Croatian military cry from the Homeland war celebrating the crash of the two terrorist Yugoslav/Serbian Airforce bombers above the city of Sibenik in Croatia (1991). It was the war in which Croatian cities were exposed to the excessive terror bombing by the “people’s army” that officially changed its role in favour of Greater Serbia; it was Milosevic that had appointed the ministers in occupied Croatia to run the aggression war. “Obadva, obadva!” (Both! both! Both are down!) A cry of hope and victory. Please check You Tube’s 1991 video for what “obadva, obadva” means in Croatia: Serbian planes are falling down - Sibenik, Croatia A few weeks ago, Cicak first bitterly cries “obadva, obadva” against Croatian Gen Gotovina (!) and his attorney. So we see who has threatened whom and where Cicak stands in respect to the war against Croatia. He sides with the terrorists against Croatia. Week in, week out, Cicak foolishly compares himself to General Gotovina. He compares their past, attacks him, Croatia, French Legion, and so on and on, and then draws the line between them. Naturally, the demarcation line is crystal clear here and no one really grasps why Cicak engaged into this Sizif’s work of his. "Fearless" Cicak then ridicules General Gotovina’s brother, his Catholic faith and his sense of duty to protect the family, so to attack Croatia’s family-oriented tradition overall. For him, protecting one’s family a value of “Sicilian mafia.” But Cicak’s family, the women in particular, would be something noble: he’s concerned that they might panic and fear something and calls police to protect them from the alleged threats. What have general Gotovina or his family done to him so to deserve Čičak's insults on injuries? Nothing. Cicak revealed in his previous article why he calls names implying treason, which upset his family: Because General Gotovina’s attorneys requested from The Hague’s prosecutors to name the members of the “criminal enterprise” in Croatian Homeland war designated in the indictment only as the government officials down to the lowest govrnement level. Is there anything more normal than knowing with whom one “committed the crime” that is being accused of, if he really did it. Who’s part of the alleged “criminal enterprise” in the indictment against Croatia. Should Croatia be harassed and blackmailed by it forever – whenever someone sincerely honours the war of independence or Croatia. Cicak seems to be too attached to the idea that The Hague’s tribunal should continue to serve as a tool of political pressure on Croatia. Whenever they don’t like what someone does or says, they can use the “criminal enterprise” accusation and call the name. Wonder not, most politicians from war-time Croatia kept silent about injustices and mentioned the independence war for decoration and election purposes only. Recently they summoned up in Bajic’s office and distanced themselves from the war: "In reality, the governemnt and prime ministers run the economic policy only, whilst the defense, intelligence, police and foreign policy were accountable to Croatian president." They certainly made themselves so wealthy that no “American dream” can do it so quick. No country in the world has ever had such a government that would declare such a thing after gaining its independence, paid by more than 10,000 lost Croatian lives for it, and hundereds of thousands refugees. Therefore, how Cicak could have said that a “hero (Gotovina) defends himself by accusing his co-combatants” when those “co-combatants” clearly stated that they had nothing to do with Croatia’s combat for freedom. Too bad. The American ambassador in Croatia, soon after their public desertion and denunciation, praises the “Croatian highly trained and motivated volunteers" who "are still playing a positive role” in his bid for "young and exceptional" Croatia to join the NATO’s missions and NATO’s noble common enterprise. Croatian army is built in the Homeland war. Even now the moneyed politicians and “elites” of Croatia deserted but Cicak fights for them. Knowing that Carla Del Ponte has just been found to have made a deal with Serbia and protected the documents that would indict Serbia for genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia, the plot of false indictments against Croatia becomes all too real and clear to Croatians. Back to Cicak, he too embarrassed Carla Del Ponte. It all seem to have started between them with Cicak's struggle for one of the generals's attorney Miroslav Separovic that was removed from the defense after all, and Cicak turned his rage against the attorney Kehoes. Cicak showed that Del Ponte asked him to stop his publications against Mr Kehoes and said that she invited him for a coffee out of fear that his attack on the attorney might bring into question the entire indictment for operation Storm. All in all, it’s hard to say what this disarray is about. The Hague is agitated… The economy-minded nothing-to-do-with-the-war-of-independence politicians are suddenly “shocked” by the “Hague’s deal with Serbia” and its “discovered” biases. Even president Mesic feels threatened by The Hague’s hidden list of “criminal enterprise” members and plays a new card denying, only for his own parade, the accusation of “criminal enterprise” – after having shipped off the “presidential transcripts,” now used as the key evidence against Croatia. Del Ponte Denies Belgrade Deal Claims. “Some observers“ for the IWPR said “the tribunal did nothing wrong when it agreed with Belgrade that the documents from the then Yugoslavia’s highest political and military body, the Supreme Defence Council, SDC, remain secret.” The director of the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland defends Del Ponte too: “She must have seen this as the most productive way to get relevant and useful information in difficult circumstances." Simonovic, equally “shocked,” suggests to Croatia to make a deal with Serbia should The Hague’s deal fail. Sanader first announced an investigation but then Cicak-Del Ponte scandal broke out and he ordered the attorneys to make a deal. There seem to be a war for The Hague’s survival after a series of scandals. The falsely accused and their families suffer for it. The Hague’s characters live off it. And let’s concede Cicak is a rather large hero in The Hague’s dishonorable, criminal enterprise. He revealed to the public the “humanity,” "civilty" and “sanity” of The Hague’s processes, and he's to live with it a very long time. If he feels hunted, he picked a wrong person to blame for it. (I wish a long life to Cicak, in spite of his Sizif’s syndrome, and apologize to him, his funs and my readers that my latest text is a tiny bit larger than his “rather large person and writing accomplishment.” But then, we should never dare to compare….. Even if it were a Sizif’s work on my part too to reply to such serial truth killers in his columns…)
|
ČIČKOVO "POZAMAŠNO" HEROJSTVO OBJELODANJENO LT, 22. travnja 2007. Možemo li se konačno protegnuti, opustiti i izbliza pogledati navodnu žrtvu u špici zločina u hrvatskim medijima - glavni protagonist je među živima, živ ali moguće ne posve zdrav. Ivan Zvonimir Čičak se požalio medijima da mu je brat generala Gotovine "prijetio smrću" ako nastavi prozivati svakakim imenima njegova brata u svojim zlobnim kolumnama. "Cinker, druker i denuncijant..." Čičak je ponovno objavio svoj bijesni uredak, točnije 1247 riječi, od čega je pola teško razumljiv balkanski žargon, a pola citati njegova vlastitog "pozamašnog lika" iz njegovih ranijih "pozamašnih pisanih djela" - a dvije minute kasnije, još je živ, protivno navodnoj prijetnji da će biti ubijen. Citirani atributi također pripadaju najnovijoj Čičkovoj samokritici, to jest njegovom "pisanom djelu." Morao bi se sad osjećati ponovno rođenim. Ali ne. Čičak je osuđen živjeti takav kakav je. "Međutim, ja ne mogu drugačije," žali se on. Tako naš hrabri Čičak sad piše: “Slična situacija u kojoj sam se ja našao [kad je bio u jugoslavenskom zatvoru], ali u drugom okruženju i iz drugih razloga, događa se upravo Anti Gotovini, trenutnom optuženiku. On, međutim, nema kapaciteta nositi se sa situacijom u kojoj se našao." Evo situacije. Zar je Čičak zaboravio, tek što je opet ponovio, da je generala Gotovinu prozvao "cinkerom, drukerom i denuncijantom." Lako se možemo složiti s Čičkom da general Gotovina nema taj kapacitet. Ali Čičak ga ima i Hrvatima je uvijek bila sumnjiva njegova uloga u jugoslavenskom zatvoru. Sad treba rasvijetliti tko je komu prijetio ubojstvom. Na Blogu o demokraciji već ima članak Čičak u "europskoj, Sanaderovoj i Račanovoj Hrvatskoj" poziva na ubojstvo? (19. ožujka 2007.) Čičak je prvo pokušao zlouporabiti i izokrenuti glasoviti hrvatski vojni krik iz Domovinskog rata u slavu pada dva teroristička jugoslavenska/srpska bombardera nad Šibenikom u Hrvatskoj (1991). Bilo je to u ratu u kojem su hrvatski gradovi bili izloženi prekomjernom teroriziranju i bombardiranju od strane "narodne armije" koja je službeno promijenila svoju zadaću u korist velike Srbije; bio je to Milošević koji je imenovao ministre u okupiranoj Hrvatskoj da vode agresorski rat. "Obadva, obadva! Oba su pala!" Krik nade i pobjede. Molim pogledajte snimku iz 1991 na You Tube i što "obadva, obadva" znači u Hrvatskoj: Srušeni srpski zrakoplovi - Šibenik, Hrvatska Prije nekoliko tjedana, Čičak gorko kliče "obadva, obadva" protiv hrvatskog generala Gotovine (!) i njegova odvjetnika. Tako vidimo tko komu prijeti i gdje Čičak stoji glede rata protiv Hrvatske. Čičak je na strani terorista protiv Hrvatske. Iz tjedna u tjedan, Čičak se suludo uspoređuje s generalom Gotovinom. Uspoređuje njihove prošlosti, napada njega, Hrvatsku, francuske legije, i tako redom, a onda povlači crtu između sebe i njega. Naravno, crta razdvajanja je ovdje kristalno jasna i nitko zapravo ne shvaća zašto se Čičak upustio u taj Sizifov posao. "Nije strašljiv," pa Čičak ismijava brata generala Gotovine, njegovu katoličku vjeru i osjećaj dužnosti da zaštiti obitelj, da bi napao svu obiteljsku tradiciju u Hrvata. Tu vrijednost pripisuje obilježju "sicilijanske mafije." Ali Čičkova je obitelj, napose njezin "ženski dio," visoka, plemenita vrijednost: brine se da ne bude u paničnom strahu od nečega i poziva policiju da ih zaštiti od navodnih prijetnji. Što je general Gotovina ikad učinio njemu ili njegovoj obitelji pa da mu Čičak dosipa sol na rane. Ništa. Čičak otkriva u ranijem članku zašto ga naziva pogrdnim imenima implicirajući izdaju, što je uznemirilo njegovu obitelj. Jer "Trolist Gotovina, Mišetić, Kehoe u svojem je podnesku preko Suda tražio od Tužiteljstva da poimence navede ostale članove zločinačkog pothvata" koji su u optužnici označeni kao “vladini dužnosnici" sve do “najnižih nivoa vlasti.” Ima li išta normalnije nego znati s kim je netko "počinio zločin" u optužnici protiv Hrvatske. Tko je sudjelovao u "združenom zločinačkom pothvatu." Treba li Hrvatsku vječno progoniti i ucjenjivati time - čim netko iskreno oda počast ratu za neovisnost ili Hrvatskoj. Čičak se izgleda preveć uhvatio ideje da haški tribunal treba nastaviti služiti kao sredstvo pritiska na Hrvatsku. Čim im se nečiji rad ili pisanje ne svidi iz bilo kojeg razloga, može se potegnuti optužba za "združeni zločin" i prozvati novo ime. Ne čudi da je većina političara držala zalivena usta o nepravdama a rat za neovisnost spominjala tek za paradne i izborne potrebe. Nedavno sazvani u Bajicev ured, ogradili se od rata: "U stvarnosti, vlada i premijeri vodili su samo gospodarsku politiku, a obrana, vanjski poslovi, policija i obavještajne službe bile su odgovorne predsjedniku." Jedino je sigurno da su postali tako bogati da ni "američki san" ne ide tako brzo. Nikad ni jedna zamlja na svijetu nije imala takvu vladu koja bi dala objaviti takvu stvar nakon stjecanja neovisnosti svoje domovine uz cijenu od preko 10.000 palih hrvatskih života za nju, i stotine tisuća prognanika. Dakle, kako je Čičak mogao izjaviti "Heroj (Gotovina) se brani tako da optužuje svoje suborce" kad su ti "suborci" dali u javnost da ništa nemaju s hrvatskom borbom za slobodu. Loše po njih. Američki veleposlanik u Hrvatskoj je odmah nakon njihovog javnog dezerterstva i izdaje pohvalio "hrvatske visoko uvježbane i motivirane dragovoljce" koji "i dalje imaju izuzetno pozitivnu ulogu" da bi "mlada i izuzetna" Hrvatska sudjelovala u NATO-vim misijama i NATO-ovim "združenim," "plemenitim pothvatima." Ta hrvatska vojska je stvorena u Domovinskom ratu. I sad ekonomski političari dezertiraju, ali se Čičak bori za njih. Znajući da je Carla Del Ponte upravo otkrivena u dogovoru sa Srbijom te utaji dokumenata koji bi optužili Srbiju za genocid, zavjera s lažnim optužnicama protiv Hrvatske postaje javna i stvarna za Hrvate. Opet o Čičku - i on je uznemirio Carlu Del Ponte. Sve je izgleda počelo među njima s Čičkovom borbom za odvjetnika jednog od generala, Miroslava Šeparovića, koji je nakraju maknut iz obrane i Čičak je usmjerio svoj bijes na odvjetnika Kehoesa. Čičak je pokazao kako mu Carla Del Ponte zabranjuje objavu dokumenata protiv gosp. Kehoesa te kaže da ga je pozvala na kavu jer je zabrinuta da bi to moglo dovesti u pitanje cijelu optužnicu za Oluju. Sve skupa, teško je reći o kakvoj se to općoj uzbuni radi. Haag je uzdrman... Gospodarski orijentirani političari koji ništa nemaju s prošlim ratom odjedanput su šokirani haaškim dogovorom sa Srbijom otkrili haašku pristranost. Čak se i predsjednik Mesić osjetio ugroženim zatajenim haaškim popisom članova "zločinačkog pothvata" i igra na novu kartu paradnog odbacivanja teze o "zločinačkom pothvatu" - nakon svih odaslanih "predsjedničkih transkripta" na kojima će tužiteljstvo dokazivati hrvatsku krivnju. Del Ponte demantira optužbe o njezinu dogovoru sa Srbijom. "Neki promatrači" za IWPR kažu da "sud nije učinio ništa loše kad se dogovorio s Beogradom da dokumenti nekadašnjih visokih političkih i vojnih tijela vlasti, državnog vojnog savjeta, ostanu tajni." Direktor Irskog centra za ljudska prava pri National University of Ireland također brani Del Ponte: "Mora da je u tom (dogovoru/utaji) vidjela najučinkovitiji način da dođe do korisnih informacija u složenim okolnostima." Šimonović, jednako "šokiran," predlaže da se Hrvatska dogovori sa Srbijom ako haaški dogovor propadne. Sanader je prvo najavio istragu o toj utaji, ali onda je izbio Čičkov skandal s Carlom del Ponte, te je naredio odvjetnicima da se oni "dogovore". Izgleda se tu radi o ratu za opstanak Haaga nakon nebrojenih skandala. Lažno optuženi i njihove obitelji trpe za to. Haaški junaci žive od njihove patnje. I popustimo Čičku i složimo se da je "pozamašan" heroj u ovom haaškom nečasnom, kriminalnom pothvatu. Pokazao je javnosti svu "humanost," "civiliziranost" i "razumnost" haaških procesa i njemu je s time dugo živjeti. Ako se osjeća ugroženim, našao je pogrešnu osobu koju će za to kriviti. (Želim dug život Čičku, unatoč njegovom sizifskom sindromu, i ispričavam se njemu, njegovim obožavateljima i mojim čitateljima što je moj tekst tek malo opsežniji od njegova "pozamašnog lika i pisanog djela." Svjedno, ne bismo se usudili uspoređivati.... Čak i u slučaju da je sizifski posao bilo odgovoriti na serijska ubojstva istine u njegovim kolumnama...)
|
||
|
How the wars will end forever in Europe. Let's read on... LT, 19 Oct 2006 "Once Europe is complitely united - economy, technology, health care, science and the rest, when the borders open, when all decisions, which will be applied to all Europe, will be made through a democratic procedure, Europe will be a true partner to America. When the borders open, it will not matter who's on which side of the border because the rules will be essentially the same. So it will be between us too when the conditions improve and when we accept European standards," said Mesic. "That Europe will forever exclude the war as political means. There will be no point in making war for the frontiers. It's why European integration is important. There will be no motive for the war in this region of ours," he said in the interview given in Karadjordjevo in Vojvodina, where he attended with the heads of the Southeast European countries, on Monday, the conference dealing with combating organized crime and terrorism.... Mesic also said Croatia will be a greatest promoter of Serbia's and the region's entry into the EU." (Vecernji list, 18 Oct 2006)
President of Serbia, Boris Tadic and President of Croatia, Stjepan Mesic It's hard to say if this was what made laugh so much Croatian Prime Minister, who was with Croatian delegation at the meeting with the US at that time. In any event, these four individuals might give a complete picture of what's going on. Croatian delegation offered to Mr. Bush more soldiers for Afghanistan, even though Mr. Bush didn't ask for it, Mr. Sanader said. However, according to the AP report of 17 Oct 2006, "some in Zagreb, the capital, expect this presence to be increased as part of Croatia's NATO accession process." According to Vecernji list, "some in Zagreb" would be Croatian public that "speculates" about it, althouh it is some Mr Sanader's closest minister who publicly announced sending more troops to Afghanistan: "Croatian Foreign Affairs and European Integration Minister Kolinda Grabar Kitarovic has announced the possibility of Croatia increasing the number of its troops deployed in Afghanistan." (Croatia’s Afghanistan contingent may increase, Online Journal, 19 Oct 2006). Why some people hide the truth? Back to a laughing matter, "While prospects that Croatia eventually will join NATO look good, its hopes of admission to the European Union are less promising." Of course, "European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said there could be no more EU enlargements after Romania and Bulgaria join Jan. 1 until the union has resolved the future of its stalled constitution." (AP) Yet, something tells me these 4 are good friends and they have some common agenda. Indeed, during his visit to the US, Croatian prime minister first thanked to Croatian president Mesic for "his excellent representation of Croatia in the world during 2 mandates." (Jutarnji list, 18 Oct 2006) He might have told him that in Croatia. So, it was for American (Mr. Bush's and Mr. Burns's) ears. Poor Europe, and Croatia, with them: While the one (Sanader) supports foreign wars that some fear could result in less security in Europe (and in the US too, but Europe proved to be more sensitive to the Islam-Christianity clashes than the US judging from islamic reaction to Danish cartoons and recent Benedict XVI speach), the other (Mesic) promises no more wars in the United Europe. Will Europe (and perhaps the US too) just surrender once the islamist terrorism gains the ground? This becomes terrific when we consult the authority on the US politics, Bernard Lewis, and see what he once said for Humanities, July/August 2006, Volume 27/Number 4: "As far as I'm concerned, what really matters is the clash between Christendom and Islam, which begins with the advent of Islam and is continued to the present day." But it works in a strange way according to this author: "The most extraordinary moment was when Monsieur Jean-Pierre Raffarin--then French prime minister--in a speech in the National Assembly on October 8, 2002, was speaking of Saddam Hussein. He said, "One of Saddam Hussein's great heroes is Saladin." And in case his listeners in the French chamber didn't know, he said, "It was Saladin who was able to defeat the Crusaders and liberate Jerusalem.".... Liberate..(Ibid) Who will liberate Europe in the event of the war. Muslims? And then, what? Mr. Bush, Mr. Sanader, Mr. Tadic, Mr. Mesic make up a strange crowd, but pershaps not so paradoxical in their politics as it may seem on the surface. At least we get it now why all these new Croatian faces in grand politics became liberators. Others, who liberated Croatia once, are the "criminals." In my humble opinion, if their (anti-terrorist) intentions were honest and fair, the first issue for these meetings would be an immediate release of wrongly accused best Croatian soldiers from The Hague. Not to mention Croatian journalists who are also accused by The Hague tribunal for exposing a great national threason, sale and theft as put in motion by Sanader and Mesic. Perhaps Mr Bush (or The Hague tribunal) hasn't asked for that either, but it clicked to Mesic and Sanader... This is basically why the role of Croatian troups in Afghanistan and all this NATO talk make no one delighted, except for those 4 strange friends in the picture and a few excited reporters in their regime's service. LT
|
Ratovi zauvijek nestaju u Europi? Pogledajmo kako... LT, 19. 10. 2006 "Kad se u Europi sve udruži
- gospodarstva, tehnologija, zdravstvo, školstvo, znanost i drugo, kad se
otvore granice, kad se odluke koje će vrijediti za cijelu Europu budu
donosile u jednoj demokratskoj proceduri Europa će biti pravi partner
Americi. Kad se tu otvore granice onda će biti sasvim svejedno tko je s
koje strane granice jer pravila će biti u suštini ista .Tako će biti i kod
nas kad sazru uvjeti i kad prihvatimo euro-standarde ", rekao je Mesić.
Hrvatski premijer Ivo Sanader i Predsjednik SAD-a G.W. Bush Teško je reći ako je ovo toliko nasmijalo hrvatskog premijera koji je s hrvatskom delegacijom u posjetu u SAD-u u isto vrijeme. U svakom slučaju, ova četvorica bi mogli dati ukupnu sliku novosti. Hrvatska delegacija nudi poslati gosp. Bushu više hrvatskih vojnika u Afghanistan, premda to gosp. Bush nije niti spomenuo, kaže Sanader. Međutim, sudeci po vijestima iz AP od 17 Oct 2006, "neki u Zagrebu očekuju da se njihov broj poveća u skopu procesa pristupa Hrvatske NATO-u." Prema Večernjem listu, "neki u Zagrebu" je hrvatska javnost koja "špekulira" o tome, premda je neka Sanaderova najbliskija ministrica javno najavila slanje dodatnog broja vojnika u Afghanistan: "Ministrica vanjskih poslova i europskih integracija Kolinda Grabar Kitarovic najavila je mogućnost povećanja broja vojnika koji će biti raspoređeni u Afghanistan." (Croatia’s Afghanistan contingent may increase, Online Journal, 19 Oct 2006). Zašto neki kriju istinu? Natrag na predmet smijeha, "Dok su izgledi za hrvatsko pristupanje NATO-u dosta dobri, nade za priključenje EU-ji su puno manje." Naravno, "Predsjednik Europske komisije Jose Manuel Barroso rekao je nema širenja EU nakon što pristupe Rumunija i Bugarska 1. sijecnja sve dok EU ne riješi budućnost svog ustava." (AP, 17 Oct 2006) Ipak, nešto nam kaže da su ova 4 dobri prijatelji i da imaju neku zajedničku agendu. Uistinu, tijekom posjeta SAD-u, hrvatski premijer zahvaljuje hrvatskom predsjedniku Mesiću jer “već u dva mandata izvrsno predstavlja Hrvatsku u svijetu.” (Jutarnji list, 18 Oct 2006) Mogao mu je to reći i u Hrvatskoj. Znači to je za Američke (Bushove i Burnsove) uši. Jadna Europe, i Hrvatska, s njima: dok jedan (Sanader) podržava strane ratove za koje neki strahuju da će rezultirati padom sigurnosti u Europi (a i u SAD-u, međutim Europa se pokazala osjetljivijom od SAD-a na sukobe Islama i Kršćanstva, sudeći po reakcijama na Danske crtiće i govor Sv. Oca Pape Benedikta XVI); drugi (Mesic) obećava nestanak rata u ujedinjenoj Europi. Hoće li se Europa (a možda i SAD) jednostavno predati kad islamski terorizam nađe plodno tlo? Ovo postane strašno kad se konzultiramo s auteritetom američke politike, Bernardom Lewis, i vidimo što je on izjavio za Humanities, July/August 2006, Volume 27/Number 4: "Što se mene tiče, ono što je doista važno je sukob između Kršćanstva i Islama, koji traje od adventa Islama do dana današnjega." Ali to radi na čudan način sudeći po ovom autoru: "Najveći trenutak je bio kad je gosp. Jean-Pierre Raffarin-- bivši francuski premijer -- u govoru nacionalnom vijeću od 8. listopada 2002 govorio o Saddamu Husseinu. Rekao je, 'Jedan od najvećih heroja Saddama Husseina je Saladin." U slučaju da njegovi slušatelji u francuskoj odaji ne znaju, rekao je, 'To je Saladin koji je bio sposoban poraziti Križare i osloboditi Jerusalem.'" ... Osloboditi... (Ibid) Tko će osloboditi Europu u slučaju rata? Muslimani? I što poslije? Gospoda Bush, Sanader, Tadic i Mesic čudna su klapa, ali možda i ne tako paradoksalna u svojoj politici kako izgleda na površini. Barem sad shvaćamo zašto su ova nova hrvatska lica u velikoj politici postala osloboditelji. Ostali, koji su jedanput oslobodili Hrvatsku, postali su "kriminalci." Po mom skromnom mišljenju, da su njihove (antiterorističke) namjere iskrene, prva tema tih sastanaka bila bi žurno oslobađanje lažno optuženih najboljih hrvatskih vojnika iz Haaga. Da ne spominjemo hrvatske novinare koji su također optuženi pred haaškim tribunalom za iznošenje istine o velikoj nacionalnoj izdaji, prodaji i krađi koju su pokrenuli Sanader i Mesić. Možda ni to nije Bush (ili Haag) tražio, ali Mesić i Sanader se sami dosjete... Uglavnom zato uloga hrvatskih vojnika u Afghanistanu i NATO priče nikog ne oduševljavaju, osim ovu četvoricu i nekoliko režimskih novinara koji o tome uzbuđeno javljaju. LT
|
||
